EMGF ranks 1st and FEMS 17th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
EMGF vs FEMS
EMGF −0.54pt a year
0.26%0.80%
EMGF 4.1×the volume
156K37.9K
EMGF +2.3pt
+8.9%+6.6%
EMGF vs FEMS Performance
+54.0%+21.3%
- EMGF 0.26%, better
- FEMS 0.80%
- EMGF $1.79B
- FEMS $195M
- EMGF +14.1%, better
- FEMS −2.7%
- EMGF 2.20%
- FEMS 4.55%, better
- EMGF 740
- FEMS 211
- EMGF 156K sh, better
- FEMS 37.9K sh
- EMGF $65.41
- FEMS $39.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMGF | FEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F3 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D36Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | C48 | A74Higher |
| Durability | A89Higher | B67 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. EMGF and FEMS are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMGFA
FEMSD
In short
EMGF Emerging markets, sorted by factor screen instead of straight market cap. EMGF holds roughly 700 large- and mid-cap EM stocks picked for style-factor exposure, and charges 0.26% doing it, about half the multifactor EM norm.
FEMS Emerging market small caps, chosen by First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value rules instead of ranked by size. A narrow, off-the-beaten-path slice of EM that has been running since 2012.
Stated mandate
EMGF EMGF seeks to follow an index of large- and mid-capitalization emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to specified style factors, subject to constraints.
FEMS The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® Emerging Markets Small CapTM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMGF vs FEMS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMGF vs FEMS Cost
Overpaying FEMS vs EMGF
$9,988
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMGF 0.26%
$5,358
FEMS 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMGF | FEMS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $1,422 | $949 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $5,393 | $3,555 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $15,346 | $9,988 |
- 0.26%EMGF, cheaper
- 0.80%FEMS
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
EMGF 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
FEMS 19th cheapest of 20 funds
EMGF vs FEMS Dividends
- EMGF 2.20%
- FEMS 4.55%, better
- EMGF $1.44
- FEMS $1.80
- EMGF $0.61
- FEMS $0.40
- EMGF Jun 15, 2026
- FEMS Sep 24, 2026
- EMGF Jun 18, 2026
- FEMS Sep 30, 2026
- EMGF Twice a year
- FEMS Quarterly
Distribution history
EMGF vs FEMS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMGF
- FEMS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMGF 16.3%FEMS 14.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMGF 1.09, betterFEMS 0.29
- Worst fall
- EMGF −27.1%FEMS −21.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EMGF 1.02FEMS 0.61
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.