QEMM ranks 4th and FEMS 17th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FEMS vs QEMM
QEMM −0.50pt a year
0.80%0.30%
FEMS 9.8×the volume
37.9K3.85K
QEMM +0.8pt
+6.6%+7.4%
FEMS vs QEMM Performance
+21.3%+39.0%
- FEMS 0.80%
- QEMM 0.30%, better
- FEMS $195M
- QEMM $56M
- FEMS −2.7%
- QEMM +16.8%, better
- FEMS 4.55%
- QEMM 4.65%, better
- FEMS 211
- QEMM 836
- FEMS 37.9K sh, better
- QEMM 3.85K sh
- FEMS $39.84
- QEMM $76.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEMS | QEMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | B65Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B59 |
| Durability | B67Higher | C52 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FEMS and QEMM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEMSD
QEMMB
In short
FEMS Emerging market small caps, chosen by First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value rules instead of ranked by size. A narrow, off-the-beaten-path slice of EM that has been running since 2012.
QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.
Stated mandate
FEMS The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® Emerging Markets Small CapTM Index.
QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEMS vs QEMM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEMS vs QEMM Cost
Overpaying FEMS vs QEMM
$9,197
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEMS 0.80%
$15,346
QEMM 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEMS | QEMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $545 | $877 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $2,113 | $3,280 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $6,149 | $9,197 |
- 0.80%FEMS
- 0.30%QEMM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds
FEMS 19th cheapest of 20 funds
FEMS vs QEMM Dividends
- FEMS 4.55%
- QEMM 4.65%, better
- FEMS $1.80
- QEMM $3.52
- FEMS $0.40
- QEMM $1.05
- FEMS Sep 24, 2026
- QEMM Jun 1, 2026
- FEMS Sep 30, 2026
- QEMM Jun 5, 2026
- FEMS Quarterly
- QEMM Twice a year
Distribution history
FEMS vs QEMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FEMS
- QEMM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEMS 14.2%QEMM 13.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FEMS 0.29QEMM 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- FEMS −21.2%, betterQEMM −27.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FEMS 0.61QEMM 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.