EMGF ranks 1st and GEM 9th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
EMGF vs GEM
EMGF −0.09pt a year
0.26%0.35%
EMGF 1.3×the volume
156K124K
EMGF +1.4pt
+8.9%+7.5%
EMGF vs GEM Performance
+53.9%+40.2%
- EMGF 0.26%, better
- GEM 0.35%
- EMGF $1.79B
- GEM $1.68B
- EMGF +14.5%, better
- GEM +13.2%
- EMGF 2.19%, better
- GEM 2.06%
- EMGF 740
- GEM 734
- EMGF 156K sh, better
- GEM 124K sh
- EMGF $65.41
- GEM $47.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMGF | GEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | B68 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | C48Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A89Higher | A76 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. EMGF and GEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMGFA
GEMB
In short
EMGF Emerging markets, sorted by factor screen instead of straight market cap. EMGF holds roughly 700 large- and mid-cap EM stocks picked for style-factor exposure, and charges 0.26% doing it, about half the multifactor EM norm.
GEM Goldman's 2015 ETF debut class included this one: emerging markets screened through four factors (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) across roughly 700 names for 0.35% a year. A full-market map with tilts, not a concentrated bet.
Stated mandate
EMGF EMGF seeks to follow an index of large- and mid-capitalization emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to specified style factors, subject to constraints.
GEM The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Emerging Markets Equity Index, which provides exposure to equity securities of emerging-market issuers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMGF vs GEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMGF vs GEM Cost
Overpaying GEM vs EMGF
$1,768
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMGF 0.26%
$5,358
GEM 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMGF | GEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $634 | $161 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $2,454 | $616 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $7,126 | $1,768 |
- 0.26%EMGF, cheaper
- 0.35%GEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
EMGF 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
GEM 6th cheapest of 20 funds
EMGF vs GEM Dividends
- EMGF 2.19%, better
- GEM 2.06%
- EMGF $1.44
- GEM $0.96
- EMGF $0.61
- GEM $0.96
- EMGF Jun 15, 2026
- GEM Dec 23, 2025
- EMGF Jun 18, 2026
- GEM Dec 30, 2025
- EMGF Twice a year
- GEM Annual
Distribution history
EMGF vs GEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMGF
- GEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMGF 16.3%GEM 15.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMGF 1.09, betterGEM 1.02
- Worst fall
- EMGF −27.1%, betterGEM −31.4%
- Market sensitivity
- EMGF 1.02GEM 1.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.