QEMM ranks 4th and GEM 9th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
GEM vs QEMM
QEMM −0.05pt a year
0.35%0.30%
GEM 32.3×the volume
124K3.85K
GEM +0.4pt
+7.5%+7.1%
GEM vs QEMM Performance
+40.2%+38.9%
- GEM 0.35%
- QEMM 0.30%, better
- GEM $1.68B
- QEMM $56M
- GEM +13.2%
- QEMM +16.5%, better
- GEM 2.06%
- QEMM 4.66%, better
- GEM 734
- QEMM 836
- GEM 124K sh, better
- QEMM 3.85K sh
- GEM $47.78
- QEMM $76.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GEM | QEMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | C52Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | D37 | B59Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | C52 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. GEM and QEMM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GEMB
QEMMB
In short
GEM Goldman's 2015 ETF debut class included this one: emerging markets screened through four factors (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) across roughly 700 names for 0.35% a year. A full-market map with tilts, not a concentrated bet.
QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.
Stated mandate
GEM The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Emerging Markets Equity Index, which provides exposure to equity securities of emerging-market issuers.
QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GEM vs QEMM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GEM vs QEMM Cost
Overpaying GEM vs QEMM
$977
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GEM 0.35%
$7,126
QEMM 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GEM | QEMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $545 | $89 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $2,113 | $341 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $6,149 | $977 |
- 0.35%GEM
- 0.30%QEMM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds
GEM 6th cheapest of 20 funds
GEM vs QEMM Dividends
- GEM 2.06%
- QEMM 4.66%, better
- GEM $0.96
- QEMM $3.52
- GEM $0.96
- QEMM $1.05
- GEM Dec 23, 2025
- QEMM Jun 1, 2026
- GEM Dec 30, 2025
- QEMM Jun 5, 2026
- GEM Annual
- QEMM Twice a year
Distribution history
GEM vs QEMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GEM
- QEMM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GEM 15.6%QEMM 13.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GEM 1.02, betterQEMM 1.00
- Worst fall
- GEM −31.4%QEMM −27.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GEM 1.10QEMM 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.