Skip to content

GEM vs QEMM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

GEMBNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

QEMMBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

QEMM −0.05pt a year

GEM0.35%QEMM0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GEM 32.3×the volume

GEM124KQEMM3.85K

10Y return · a year

GEM +0.4pt

GEM+7.5%QEMM+7.1%

GEM vs QEMM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+40.2%GEM+38.9%QEMM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. GEM +40.2%. QEMM +38.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GEM 0.35%
QEMM 0.30%, better
Fund size
GEM $1.68B
QEMM $56M
1Y total return
GEM +13.2%
QEMM +16.5%, better
Yield (12M)
GEM 2.06%
QEMM 4.66%, better
Holdings
GEM 734
QEMM 836
Avg volume (30D)
GEM 124K sh, better
QEMM 3.85K sh
NAV per share
GEM $47.78
QEMM $76.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GEM: Cost 68, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 52, Holdings 37, Durability 76. QEMM: Cost 82, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings 59, Durability 52.
Pillar letters and Scores for GEM, QEMM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGEMQEMM
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41B67Higher
Tradability15% weightC52HigherD38
Holdings10% weightD37B59Higher
Durability5% weightA76HigherC52

Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GEM and QEMM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

QEMM ranks 4th and GEM 9th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AEMGFiShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AAVESAvantis Emerging Markets Value ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3AFDEMFidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BQEMMState Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 5BDFEVDimensional Emerging Markets Value ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 8BROAMHartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETFScore 60
  7. Rank 9BGEMGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 56
  8. Rank 10CUEVMVictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GEMBGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

QEMMBState Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

In short

GEM Goldman's 2015 ETF debut class included this one: emerging markets screened through four factors (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) across roughly 700 names for 0.35% a year. A full-market map with tilts, not a concentrated bet.

QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.

Stated mandate

GEM The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Emerging Markets Equity Index, which provides exposure to equity securities of emerging-market issuers.

QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.

Why people hold it

  • GEM Four factors at once: good value, strong momentum, high quality and low volatility, scored stock by stock and blended, so no single tilt runs the portfolio.gsam.com
  • 0.35% a year, below the median for emerging-market multifactor funds, with no fee waiver doing the work: the gross and net numbers are the same.
  • Roughly 700 holdings gives it the breadth of a core EM index fund rather than a narrow factor sleeve, and it has been a multi-billion-dollar fund trading since 2015.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded multifactor emerging-market field, and it tracks a single named index rather than a shifting in-house process.gsam.com
  • QEMM One ticket, three tilts: the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series Index blends value, quality and low volatility, so no single style has to be in favor for the strategy to run as designed.ssga.com
  • At 0.30% a year it undercuts the typical fee in the multifactor emerging-markets crowd, and the portfolio is built by index rules rather than a manager's hunch.
  • Running since 2014 with roughly 800 holdings and State Street behind the wrapper: a long-lived option in a corner of the market where niche products often quietly close.
  • The low-volatility sleeve is the tell. This is emerging-markets exposure assembled to smooth the ride, not to chase the hottest single factor.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • GEM Cheaper multifactor EM options exist: EMGF at 0.26% and FDEM at 0.25%, neither leaning on a waiver.
  • Blending four factors mutes each one, so the tilt is gentler than a single-factor fund like AVES, which goes all in on value.
  • Emerging-market stocks swing hard, and currency moves and country concentration come with the mandate. The factor screen tilts that exposure, it does not defuse it.
  • QEMM Trades thinner than the category's household names, so spreads can be wider. That bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Splitting the bet three ways dilutes each factor by design, so the portfolio rarely looks or moves like a plain-vanilla emerging-markets index.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year rather than quarterly, and peers such as EMGF carry a lower fee for multifactor EM exposure.

Full GEM profile⁠

Full QEMM profile⁠

GEM vs QEMM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GEM vs QEMM Cost

Overpaying GEM vs QEMM

$977

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GEM 0.35%

    $7,126

  • QEMM 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GEM 0.35%
  • QEMM 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GEM $7,126QEMM $6,149

Year by year

YearGEMQEMMOverpaying
10$634$545$89
20$2,454$2,113$341
30$7,126$6,149$977

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%GEM
  • 0.30%QEMM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.44%

QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds

GEM 6th cheapest of 20 funds

GEM vs QEMM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GEM 2.06%
QEMM 4.66%, better
Payout (12M)
GEM $0.96
QEMM $3.52
Last payment
GEM $0.96
QEMM $1.05
Ex-dividend
GEM Dec 23, 2025
QEMM Jun 1, 2026
Paid on
GEM Dec 30, 2025
QEMM Jun 5, 2026
Frequency
GEM Annual
QEMM Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GEMAnnual · 28 paymentsAll GEM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 28 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.03; Jun 23, 2017 $0.16; Sep 22, 2017 $0.24; Dec 21, 2017 $0.22; Mar 23, 2018 $0.04; Jun 25, 2018 $0.18; Sep 24, 2018 $0.27; Dec 24, 2018 $0.14; Mar 25, 2019 $0.19; Jun 24, 2019 $0.22; Sep 24, 2019 $0.32; Dec 24, 2019 $0.35; Jun 24, 2020 $0.14; Sep 24, 2020 $0.26; Dec 24, 2020 $0.22; Jun 24, 2021 $0.21; Sep 24, 2021 $0.70; Dec 27, 2021 $0.20; Mar 25, 2022 $0.23; Jun 24, 2022 $0.36; Sep 26, 2022 $0.18; Dec 27, 2022 $0.07; Mar 27, 2023 $0.34; Jun 26, 2023 $0.19; Sep 25, 2023 $0.21; Dec 26, 2023 $0.17; Dec 23, 2024 $0.82; Dec 23, 2025 $0.96. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
QEMMTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll QEMM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.42; Dec 15, 2017 $0.94; Jun 1, 2018 $0.37; Dec 21, 2018 $1.19; Jun 3, 2019 $0.52; Dec 20, 2019 $1.33; Jun 1, 2020 $0.48; Dec 18, 2020 $1.14; Jun 1, 2021 $0.36; Dec 17, 2021 $1.23; Jun 1, 2022 $0.59; Dec 16, 2022 $1.59; Jun 1, 2023 $1.23; Dec 15, 2023 $1.56; Jun 3, 2024 $1.20; Dec 18, 2024 $1.75; Jun 2, 2025 $0.76; Nov 25, 2025 $2.48; Jun 1, 2026 $1.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

GEM vs QEMM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GEM
  • QEMM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: GEM −31.4% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GEM 15.6%QEMM 13.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GEM 1.02, betterQEMM 1.00
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GEM −31.4%QEMM −27.1%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GEM 1.10QEMM 0.95

Popular comparisons

  • GEMBvsEMGFA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QEMMBvsEMGFA

    State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GEMBvsAVESA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QEMMBvsAVESA

    State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GEMBvsFDEMA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QEMMBvsFDEMA

    State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.