EMGF ranks 1st and TLTE 17th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
EMGF vs TLTE
EMGF −0.31pt a year
0.26%0.57%
EMGF 25.6×the volume
167K6.52K
EMGF +1.7pt
+9.0%+7.3%
EMGF vs TLTE Performance
+52.4%+37.6%
- EMGF 0.26%, better
- TLTE 0.57%
- EMGF $1.84B
- TLTE $312M
- EMGF +16.3%, better
- TLTE +13.2%
- EMGF 2.20%
- TLTE 3.57%, better
- EMGF 737
- TLTE 2943
- EMGF 167K sh, better
- TLTE 6.52K sh
- EMGF $63.72
- TLTE $67.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMGF | TLTE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F16 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C41 | C44Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | C52 | B57Higher |
| Durability | A90Higher | B63 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. EMGF and TLTE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMGFA
TLTED
In short
EMGF Emerging markets, sorted by factor screen instead of straight market cap. EMGF holds roughly 700 large- and mid-cap EM stocks picked for style-factor exposure, and charges 0.26% doing it, about half the multifactor EM norm.
TLTE Most emerging-market factor funds cut the universe down to a few hundred names. TLTE keeps roughly 3,000 stocks and simply leans the weights toward small-cap and value. A tilt, not a screen.
Stated mandate
EMGF EMGF seeks to follow an index of large- and mid-capitalization emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to specified style factors, subject to constraints.
TLTE The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, providing exposure to emerging-market stocks with an emphasis on small-capitalization and value characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMGF vs TLTE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMGF vs TLTE Cost
Overpaying TLTE vs EMGF
$5,913
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMGF 0.26%
$5,358
TLTE 0.57%
$11,271
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMGF | TLTE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $1,023 | $550 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $3,921 | $2,083 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $11,271 | $5,913 |
- 0.26%EMGF, cheaper
- 0.57%TLTE
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
EMGF 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
TLTE 17th cheapest of 20 funds
EMGF vs TLTE Dividends
- EMGF 2.20%
- TLTE 3.57%, better
- EMGF $1.44
- TLTE $2.50
- EMGF $0.61
- TLTE $0.58
- EMGF Jun 15, 2026
- TLTE Sep 18, 2026
- EMGF Jun 18, 2026
- TLTE Sep 24, 2026
- EMGF Twice a year
- TLTE Quarterly
Distribution history
EMGF vs TLTE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMGF
- TLTE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMGF 16.3%TLTE 15.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMGF 1.09, betterTLTE 0.93
- Worst fall
- EMGF −27.1%, betterTLTE −29.5%
- Market sensitivity
- EMGF 1.02TLTE 1.05
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.