EMGF ranks 1st and JPEM 6th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
EMGF vs JPEM
EMGF −0.18pt a year
0.26%0.44%
EMGF 8.9×the volume
156K17.4K
EMGF +2.3pt
+8.9%+6.6%
EMGF vs JPEM Performance
+54.0%+36.6%
- EMGF 0.26%, better
- JPEM 0.44%
- EMGF $1.79B
- JPEM $362M
- EMGF +14.1%, better
- JPEM +7.6%
- EMGF 2.20%
- JPEM 4.68%, better
- EMGF 740
- JPEM 562
- EMGF 156K sh, better
- JPEM 17.4K sh
- EMGF $65.41
- JPEM $61.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMGF | JPEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | C53 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D36 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | B68 |
| Holdings | C48 | B63Higher |
| Durability | A89Higher | A72 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. EMGF and JPEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMGFA
JPEMB
In short
EMGF Emerging markets, sorted by factor screen instead of straight market cap. EMGF holds roughly 700 large- and mid-cap EM stocks picked for style-factor exposure, and charges 0.26% doing it, about half the multifactor EM norm.
JPEM A 2015-vintage multifactor read on emerging markets: JPMorgan spreads roughly 600 names across value, quality and momentum rather than letting the biggest companies set the weights.
Stated mandate
EMGF EMGF seeks to follow an index of large- and mid-capitalization emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to specified style factors, subject to constraints.
JPEM The fund is designed to provide emerging-markets equity exposure with potentially improved risk-adjusted returns versus a market-cap-weighted index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMGF vs JPEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMGF vs JPEM Cost
Overpaying JPEM vs EMGF
$3,494
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMGF 0.26%
$5,358
JPEM 0.44%
$8,852
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMGF | JPEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $794 | $321 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $3,061 | $1,223 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $8,852 | $3,494 |
- 0.26%EMGF, cheaper
- 0.44%JPEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
EMGF 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
JPEM 10th cheapest of 20 funds
EMGF vs JPEM Dividends
- EMGF 2.20%
- JPEM 4.68%, better
- EMGF $1.44
- JPEM $2.88
- EMGF $0.61
- JPEM $0.80
- EMGF Jun 15, 2026
- JPEM Sep 22, 2026
- EMGF Jun 18, 2026
- JPEM Sep 24, 2026
- EMGF Twice a year
- JPEM Quarterly
Distribution history
EMGF vs JPEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMGF
- JPEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMGF 16.3%JPEM 10.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMGF 1.09, betterJPEM 0.88
- Worst fall
- EMGF −27.1%JPEM −21.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EMGF 1.02JPEM 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.