FDEM ranks 2nd and TLTE 17th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FDEM vs TLTE
FDEM −0.32pt a year
0.25%0.57%
FDEM 13.6×the volume
88.9K6.52K
FDEM +2.6pt
+9.2%+6.6%
FDEM vs TLTE Performance
+55.6%+37.6%
- FDEM 0.25%, better
- TLTE 0.57%
- FDEM $499M
- TLTE $312M
- FDEM +13.6%, better
- TLTE +13.2%
- FDEM 3.47%
- TLTE 3.57%, better
- FDEM 229
- TLTE 2943
- FDEM 88.9K sh, better
- TLTE 6.52K sh
- FDEM $32.97
- TLTE $67.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEM | TLTE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F16 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B60Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | C41 | B57Higher |
| Durability | B65Higher | B63 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEM and TLTE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEMA
TLTED
In short
FDEM Value, quality, momentum and low-volatility screens run across emerging markets stocks, plus an unusual extra filter: a tilt toward names less correlated with US equities. Fidelity's in-house index, priced under the category median.
TLTE Most emerging-market factor funds cut the universe down to a few hundred names. TLTE keeps roughly 3,000 stocks and simply leans the weights toward small-cap and value. A tilt, not a screen.
Stated mandate
FDEM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index.
TLTE The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, providing exposure to emerging-market stocks with an emphasis on small-capitalization and value characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEM vs TLTE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEM vs TLTE Cost
Overpaying TLTE vs FDEM
$6,112
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEM 0.25%
$5,159
TLTE 0.57%
$11,271
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEM | TLTE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $1,023 | $568 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $3,921 | $2,152 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $11,271 | $6,112 |
- 0.25%FDEM, cheaper
- 0.57%TLTE
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
FDEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
TLTE 17th cheapest of 20 funds
FDEM vs TLTE Dividends
- FDEM 3.47%
- TLTE 3.57%, better
- FDEM $1.17
- TLTE $2.50
- FDEM $0.38
- TLTE $0.58
- FDEM Sep 18, 2026
- TLTE Sep 18, 2026
- FDEM Sep 22, 2026
- TLTE Sep 24, 2026
- FDEM Quarterly
- TLTE Quarterly
Distribution history
FDEM vs TLTE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEM
- TLTE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEM 13.8%, betterTLTE 15.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEM 1.08, betterTLTE 0.93
- Worst fall
- FDEM −24.2%, betterTLTE −29.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FDEM 0.98TLTE 1.05
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.