QQQD ranks 21st and EMTY 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
EMTY vs QQQD
QQQD −0.15pt a year
0.65%0.50%
QQQD 79.6×the volume
85668.1K
EMTY vs QQQD Performance
−6.7%0.0%
- EMTY 0.65%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- EMTY $3M
- QQQD $28M
- EMTY −6.7%
- QQQD 0.0%, better
- EMTY 3.28%
- QQQD 3.32%, better
- EMTY 1
- QQQD 3
- EMTY 856 sh
- QQQD 68.1K sh, better
- EMTY $22.82
- QQQD $12.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMTY | QQQD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A73Higher | B67 |
| Tradability | D30 | C43Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D32 | D38Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EMTY and QQQD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMTYC
QQQDC
In short
EMTY A short bet with a storyline. EMTY moves inverse to a basket of bricks-and-mortar retailers and resets daily. In a bear-fund crowd built on stock indexes, currencies and volatility, it is the one aimed at a single real-world theme.
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
EMTY The fund seeks capital appreciation from declines in bricks-and-mortar retailers by taking short exposure to the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index, targeting approximately the inverse of the index’s daily performance.
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMTY vs QQQD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMTY vs QQQD Cost
Overpaying EMTY vs QQQD
$2,738
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMTY 0.65%
$12,717
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMTY | QQQD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $900 | $263 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $3,460 | $980 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $9,979 | $2,738 |
- 0.65%EMTY
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
EMTY 2nd cheapest of 53 funds
EMTY vs QQQD Dividends
- EMTY 3.28%
- QQQD 3.32%, better
- EMTY $0.73
- QQQD $0.41
- EMTY $0.17
- QQQD $0.10
- EMTY Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- EMTY Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- EMTY Quarterly
- QQQD Quarterly
Distribution history
EMTY vs QQQD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMTY 19.2%QQQD 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMTY −0.64QQQD −1.14
- Worst fall
- EMTY −30.8%QQQD −51.4%
- Market sensitivity
- EMTY −0.84QQQD −1.35
EMTY and QQQD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
