RWM ranks 4th and EMTY 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
EMTY vs RWM
EMTY −0.30pt a year
0.65%0.95%
RWM 35068.4×the volume
85630M
EMTY +0.6pt
−2.8%−3.4%
EMTY vs RWM Performance
−13.2%−15.9%
- EMTY 0.65%, better
- RWM 0.95%
- EMTY $3M
- RWM $163M
- EMTY −6.7%, better
- RWM −10.1%
- EMTY 3.28%
- RWM 3.31%, better
- EMTY 1
- RWM 3
- EMTY 856 sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- EMTY $22.82
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMTY | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A73Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | D30 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | D32 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EMTY and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMTYC
RWMB
In short
EMTY A short bet with a storyline. EMTY moves inverse to a basket of bricks-and-mortar retailers and resets daily. In a bear-fund crowd built on stock indexes, currencies and volatility, it is the one aimed at a single real-world theme.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
EMTY The fund seeks capital appreciation from declines in bricks-and-mortar retailers by taking short exposure to the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index, targeting approximately the inverse of the index’s daily performance.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMTY vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMTY vs RWM Cost
Overpaying RWM vs EMTY
$5,152
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMTY 0.65%
$12,717
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMTY | RWM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,678 | $515 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $6,322 | $1,882 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $17,869 | $5,152 |
- 0.65%EMTY, cheaper
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
EMTY 2nd cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EMTY vs RWM Dividends
- EMTY 3.28%
- RWM 3.31%, better
- EMTY $0.73
- RWM $0.48
- EMTY $0.17
- RWM $0.09
- EMTY Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- EMTY Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- EMTY Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
EMTY vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMTY
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMTY 19.2%RWM 18.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMTY −0.64, betterRWM −0.99
- Worst fall
- EMTY −30.8%, betterRWM −43.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EMTY −0.84RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.