Skip to content

GMOD vs PBL

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

PBLBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PBL −0.05pt a year

GMOD0.50%PBL0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

GMOD 2.3×the volume

GMOD11.8KPBL5.07K

GMOD vs PBL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD+7.3%PBL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. PBL +7.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%
PBL 0.45%, better
Fund size
GMOD $49M
PBL $71M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%, better
PBL +7.3%
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
PBL 2.06%
Holdings
GMOD 20
PBL 13
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh, better
PBL 5.07K sh
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
PBL $33.73
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. PBL: Cost 93, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, PBL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODPBL
Cost30% weightA90A93Higher
Mission25% weightA74Not scored
Risk15% weightA75HigherB65
Tradability15% weightA73HigherD29
Holdings10% weightB64Not scored
Durability5% weightC49B64Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and PBL are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and PBL 5th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 6BPWSPacer WealthShield ETFScore 67

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

PBLBPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

PBL No data

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

PBL No data

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.

PBL No data

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.

PBL No data

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full PBL profile⁠

GMOD vs PBL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs PBL Cost

Overpaying GMOD vs PBL

$938

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • PBL 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • PBL 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GMOD $9,979PBL $9,041

Year by year

YearGMODPBLOverpaying
10$900$812$88
20$3,460$3,128$332
30$9,979$9,041$938

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD
  • 0.45%PBL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PBL 4th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs PBL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
PBL 2.06%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
PBL $0.68
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
PBL $0.68
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
PBL Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
PBL Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
PBL Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD
PBLAnnual · 4 paymentsAll PBL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2022 $0.04; Dec 27, 2023 $2.04; Dec 27, 2024 $1.94; Dec 30, 2025 $0.68. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD

GMOD vs PBL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025PBL 8.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025PBL 1.21
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025PBL −11.6%since Dec 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48PBL 0.71

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBLBvsENDWA

    PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBLBvsPTBDA

    PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBLBvsRISNA

    PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.