Skip to content

GMOD vs RISN

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.22pt a year

GMOD0.50%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

RISN 1.2×the volume

GMOD11.8KRISN14.8K

GMOD vs RISN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD+4.8%RISN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. RISN +4.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
RISN 0.72%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
RISN $70M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%, better
RISN +4.8%
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
RISN 1.05%
Holdings
GMOD 20
RISN 53
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh
RISN 14.8K sh, better
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
RISN $31.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 46, Mission 85, Tradability 64, Holdings 80, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODRISN
Cost30% weightA90HigherA76
Mission25% weightA74A85Higher
Risk15% weightA75HigherC46
Tradability15% weightA73HigherB64
Holdings10% weightB64A80Higher
Durability5% weightC49B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and RISN 4th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

GMOD vs RISN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs RISN Cost

Overpaying RISN vs GMOD

$3,978

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530RISN $13,957GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODRISNOverpaying
10$900$1,284$384
20$3,460$4,888$1,428
30$9,979$13,957$3,978

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 0.72%RISN
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
RISN 1.05%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
RISN $0.32
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

GMOD vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025RISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025RISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025RISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48RISN 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPBLB

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPBLB

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.