ENDW ranks 1st and HEFT 11th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
ENDW vs HEFT
ENDW −0.48pt a year
0.22%0.70%
ENDW 1.3×the volume
23.3K17.9K
ENDW vs HEFT Performance
+11.9%+2.2%
- ENDW 0.22%, better
- HEFT 0.70%
- ENDW $158M
- HEFT $75M
- ENDW +14.6%
- HEFT
- ENDW 2.39%
- HEFT
- ENDW 74
- HEFT 33
- ENDW 23.3K sh, better
- HEFT 17.9K sh
- ENDW $33.62
- HEFT $25.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ENDW | HEFT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A81Higher | B65 |
| Risk | A72Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C51 |
| Durability | B65Higher | C54 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. ENDW and HEFT are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ENDWA
HEFTB
In short
ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.
HEFT A research shop's macro call in ETF form. HEFT runs an active long/short book guided by Fourth Turning generational theory: long what it reads as demographic tailwinds, short what it expects to fade.
Stated mandate
ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.
HEFT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an actively managed long/short strategy informed by Fourth Turning generational theory, varying exposure across U.S. equities, fixed income, commodities, currencies, and up to 20% international securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ENDW vs HEFT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ENDW vs HEFT Cost
Overpaying HEFT vs ENDW
$9,048
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ENDW 0.22%
$4,558
HEFT 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ENDW | HEFT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $401 | $1,250 | $849 |
| 20 | $1,561 | $4,760 | $3,199 |
| 30 | $4,558 | $13,606 | $9,048 |
- 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
- 0.70%HEFT
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
ENDW cheapest of 46 funds
HEFT 11th cheapest of 46 funds
ENDW vs HEFT Dividends
- ENDW 2.39%
- HEFT
- ENDW $0.82
- HEFT
- ENDW $0.16
- HEFT $0.005
- ENDW Sep 28, 2026
- HEFT Dec 30, 2025
- ENDW Sep 30, 2026
- HEFT Dec 31, 2025
- ENDW Quarterly
- HEFT Irregular
Distribution history
ENDW vs HEFT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ENDW 9.2%HEFT
- Return per unit of risk
- ENDW 1.99HEFT
- Worst fall
- ENDW −6.4%HEFT
- Market sensitivity
- ENDW 0.59HEFT 0.16
Popular comparisons
- 0.22% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.