Skip to content

ENDW vs HEFT

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF

HEFTBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.48pt a year

ENDW0.22%HEFT0.70%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 1.3×the volume

ENDW23.3KHEFT17.9K

ENDW vs HEFT Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+11.9%ENDW+2.2%HEFT

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. ENDW +11.9%. HEFT +2.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%7.5%10%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
HEFT 0.70%
Fund size
ENDW $158M
HEFT $75M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.6%
HEFT No data
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.39%
HEFT No data
Holdings
ENDW 74
HEFT 33
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 23.3K sh, better
HEFT 17.9K sh
NAV per share
ENDW $33.62
HEFT $25.86
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 72, Mission 81, Tradability 75, Holdings 61, Durability 65. HEFT: Cost 78, Risk 38, Mission 65, Tradability 55, Holdings 51, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, HEFT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWHEFT
Cost30% weightA100HigherA78
Mission25% weightA81HigherB65
Risk15% weightA72HigherD38
Tradability15% weightA75HigherB55
Holdings10% weightB61HigherC51
Durability5% weightB65HigherC54

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and HEFT are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and HEFT 11th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 9BMATRHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 12BHIDEAlpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

HEFTBHedgeye Fourth Turning ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

HEFT A research shop's macro call in ETF form. HEFT runs an active long/short book guided by Fourth Turning generational theory: long what it reads as demographic tailwinds, short what it expects to fade.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

HEFT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an actively managed long/short strategy informed by Fourth Turning generational theory, varying exposure across U.S. equities, fixed income, commodities, currencies, and up to 20% international securities.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • HEFT 0.70% a year, below the median for tactical multi-asset funds, and that buys an active long/short mandate rather than a rules file on autopilot.
  • The short sleeve is the point. Managers can position against areas they expect to weaken instead of only choosing which longs to own.
  • One legible thesis drives both sides of the book, so the fund's calls can be judged against the framework it publishes rather than a black box.

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • HEFT Launched in 2025. There is not yet a long record showing how the generational-cycle framework behaves across different market regimes.
  • Shorting cuts both ways: borrow costs are ongoing, and a short position's losses are not bounded the way a long position's are.
  • Small and lightly traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than in the category's household names. The mandate targets capital appreciation, not income.

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full HEFT profile⁠

ENDW vs HEFT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs HEFT Cost

Overpaying HEFT vs ENDW

$9,048

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • HEFT 0.70%

    $13,606

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • HEFT 0.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530HEFT $13,606ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWHEFTOverpaying
10$401$1,250$849
20$1,561$4,760$3,199
30$4,558$13,606$9,048

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 0.70%HEFT
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

HEFT 11th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs HEFT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.39%
HEFT No data
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
HEFT No data
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
HEFT $0.005
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
HEFT Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
HEFT Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
HEFT Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
HEFTIrregular · 1 paymentAll HEFT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.005. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

ENDW vs HEFT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025HEFT No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025HEFT No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025HEFT No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.59HEFT 0.16

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HEFTBvsRISNA

    Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPBLA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HEFTBvsPBLA

    Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HEFTBvsPTBDA

    Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.