Skip to content

HEFT vs PTBD

Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF

HEFTBNYSE Arca

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTBD −0.10pt a year

HEFT0.70%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 1.02×the volume

HEFT17.9KPTBD18.3K

HEFT vs PTBD Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+2.2%HEFT−0.2%PTBD

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. HEFT +2.2%. PTBD −0.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%5%7.5%10%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
HEFT 0.70%
PTBD 0.60%, better
Fund size
HEFT $75M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
HEFT No data
PTBD 0.0%
Yield (12M)
HEFT No data
PTBD 6.35%
Holdings
HEFT 33
PTBD 1060
Avg volume (30D)
HEFT 17.9K sh
PTBD 18.3K sh, better
NAV per share
HEFT $25.86
PTBD $18.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HEFT: Cost 78, Risk 38, Mission 65, Tradability 55, Holdings 51, Durability 54. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings 72, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for HEFT, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHEFTPTBD
Cost30% weightA78A83Higher
Mission25% weightB65Not scored
Risk15% weightD38B61Higher
Tradability15% weightB55HigherC48
Holdings10% weightC51A72Higher
Durability5% weightC54A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HEFT and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and HEFT 11th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3APBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 5BPWSPacer WealthShield ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 9BMATRHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETFScore 62
  7. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 61
  8. Rank 12BHIDEAlpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HEFTBHedgeye Fourth Turning ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

HEFT A research shop's macro call in ETF form. HEFT runs an active long/short book guided by Fourth Turning generational theory: long what it reads as demographic tailwinds, short what it expects to fade.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

HEFT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an actively managed long/short strategy informed by Fourth Turning generational theory, varying exposure across U.S. equities, fixed income, commodities, currencies, and up to 20% international securities.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • HEFT 0.70% a year, below the median for tactical multi-asset funds, and that buys an active long/short mandate rather than a rules file on autopilot.
  • The short sleeve is the point. Managers can position against areas they expect to weaken instead of only choosing which longs to own.
  • One legible thesis drives both sides of the book, so the fund's calls can be judged against the framework it publishes rather than a black box.
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • HEFT Launched in 2025. There is not yet a long record showing how the generational-cycle framework behaves across different market regimes.
  • Shorting cuts both ways: borrow costs are ongoing, and a short position's losses are not bounded the way a long position's are.
  • Small and lightly traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than in the category's household names. The mandate targets capital appreciation, not income.
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full HEFT profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

HEFT vs PTBD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HEFT vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying HEFT vs PTBD

$1,789

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HEFT 0.70%

    $13,606

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HEFT 0.70%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530HEFT $13,606PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearHEFTPTBDOverpaying
10$1,250$1,076$174
20$4,760$4,116$644
30$13,606$11,817$1,789

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%HEFT
  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

HEFT 11th cheapest of 46 funds

HEFT vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
HEFT No data
PTBD 6.35%
Payout (12M)
HEFT No data
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
HEFT $0.005
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
HEFT Dec 30, 2025
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
HEFT Dec 31, 2025
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
HEFT Irregular
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

HEFTIrregular · 1 paymentAll HEFT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.005. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

HEFT vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HEFT No dataPTBD 5.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HEFT No dataPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HEFT No dataPTBD −24.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HEFT 0.16PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • HEFTBvsENDWA

    Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HEFTBvsRISNA

    Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HEFTBvsPBLA

    Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsPBLA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.