PTBD ranks 3rd and HEFT 11th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
HEFT vs PTBD
PTBD −0.10pt a year
0.70%0.60%
PTBD 1.02×the volume
17.9K18.3K
HEFT vs PTBD Performance
+2.2%−0.2%
- HEFT 0.70%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- HEFT $75M
- PTBD $83M
- HEFT
- PTBD 0.0%
- HEFT
- PTBD 6.35%
- HEFT 33
- PTBD 1060
- HEFT 17.9K sh
- PTBD 18.3K sh, better
- HEFT $25.86
- PTBD $18.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HEFT | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A83Higher |
| Mission | B65 | |
| Risk | D38 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | C51 | A72Higher |
| Durability | C54 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. HEFT and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HEFTB
PTBDA
In short
HEFT A research shop's macro call in ETF form. HEFT runs an active long/short book guided by Fourth Turning generational theory: long what it reads as demographic tailwinds, short what it expects to fade.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
HEFT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an actively managed long/short strategy informed by Fourth Turning generational theory, varying exposure across U.S. equities, fixed income, commodities, currencies, and up to 20% international securities.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HEFT vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HEFT vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying HEFT vs PTBD
$1,789
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HEFT 0.70%
$13,606
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HEFT | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $1,076 | $174 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $4,116 | $644 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $11,817 | $1,789 |
- 0.70%HEFT
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
HEFT 11th cheapest of 46 funds
HEFT vs PTBD Dividends
- HEFT
- PTBD 6.35%
- HEFT
- PTBD $1.17
- HEFT $0.005
- PTBD $0.10
- HEFT Dec 30, 2025
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- HEFT Dec 31, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- HEFT Irregular
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
HEFT vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HEFT PTBD 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- HEFT PTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- HEFT PTBD −24.7%
- Market sensitivity
- HEFT 0.16PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.