ENDW ranks 1st and MOOD 12th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
ENDW vs MOOD
ENDW −0.55pt a year
0.22%0.77%
MOOD 1.2×the volume
17.1K20.8K
ENDW vs MOOD Performance
+14.9%+20.0%
- ENDW 0.22%, better
- MOOD 0.77%
- ENDW $160M
- MOOD $161M
- ENDW +14.9%
- MOOD +20.0%, better
- ENDW 2.37%, better
- MOOD 0.35%
- ENDW 73
- MOOD 12
- ENDW 17.1K sh
- MOOD 20.8K sh, better
- ENDW $34.35
- MOOD $44.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ENDW | MOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A81Higher | C40 |
| Risk | A75Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | B69 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | B62Higher | C50 |
| Durability | B65Higher | B61 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. ENDW and MOOD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ENDWA
MOODB
In short
ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.
MOOD Most tactical funds follow price. MOOD follows the gap between institutional and retail sentiment, averaging four indicators into one equity dial that can swing from 0% to fully invested.
Stated mandate
ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.
MOOD The Fund seeks capital appreciation by tactically allocating among ETFs and exchange-traded products covering equities, fixed income, commodities, including gold, and currencies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ENDW vs MOOD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ENDW vs MOOD Cost
Overpaying MOOD vs ENDW
$10,271
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ENDW 0.22%
$4,558
MOOD 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ENDW | MOOD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $401 | $1,371 | $970 |
| 20 | $1,561 | $5,205 | $3,644 |
| 30 | $4,558 | $14,829 | $10,271 |
- 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
- 0.77%MOOD
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
ENDW cheapest of 46 funds
MOOD 14th cheapest of 46 funds
ENDW vs MOOD Dividends
- ENDW 2.37%, better
- MOOD 0.35%
- ENDW $0.82
- MOOD $0.15
- ENDW $0.16
- MOOD $0.15
- ENDW Sep 28, 2026
- MOOD Dec 30, 2025
- ENDW Sep 30, 2026
- MOOD Dec 31, 2025
- ENDW Quarterly
- MOOD Annual
Distribution history
ENDW vs MOOD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ENDW 9.2%MOOD 9.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- ENDW 1.99MOOD 1.78
- Worst fall
- ENDW −6.4%MOOD −14.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ENDW 0.61MOOD 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.22% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.