Skip to content

MOOD vs PTBD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

MOODBNasdaq

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PTBD −0.17pt a year

MOOD0.77%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

MOOD 1.1×the volume

MOOD20.8KPTBD18.6K

3Y return · a year

MOOD +18.1pt

MOOD+23.0%PTBD+4.9%

MOOD vs PTBD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+20.0%MOOD−0.1%PTBD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MOOD +20.0%. PTBD −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MOOD 0.77%
PTBD 0.60%, better
Fund size
MOOD $161M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
MOOD +20.0%, better
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
MOOD 0.35%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Holdings
MOOD 12
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
MOOD 20.8K sh, better
PTBD 18.6K sh
NAV per share
MOOD $44.23
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MOOD: Cost 71, Risk 61, Mission 40, Tradability 78, Holdings 50, Durability 61. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for MOOD, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMOODPTBD
Cost30% weightA71A83Higher
Mission25% weightC40Not scored
Risk15% weightB61HigherB60
Tradability15% weightA78HigherC50
Holdings10% weightC50A90Higher
Durability5% weightB61A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MOOD and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and MOOD 12th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 12BLGHHCM Defender 500 Index ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 12BMOODRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETFScore 60
  7. Rank 14BHIDEAlpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MOODBRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

MOOD Most tactical funds follow price. MOOD follows the gap between institutional and retail sentiment, averaging four indicators into one equity dial that can swing from 0% to fully invested.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

MOOD The Fund seeks capital appreciation by tactically allocating among ETFs and exchange-traded products covering equities, fixed income, commodities, including gold, and currencies.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • MOOD The engine is written down: four relative sentiment indicators, each scaled 0% to 100%, averaged into the equity allocation. Long only, no leverage.alphaarchitect.cometfarchitect.com
  • Fee of 0.77% sits below the median for tactical allocation funds, with no waiver propping it up, and the fund stands in the upper half of that peer group.
  • Live since 2022 and measured against a stated blend: 40% US aggregate bonds, 30% US large caps, 30% developed markets outside North America.
  • Gold and commodities enter on documented triggers, such as bearish dollar and Fed-policy sentiment, rather than a manager's hunch.alphaarchitect.com
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • MOOD The sentiment inputs are proprietary: you see the resulting weights, not the signal. Allocations are recomputed weekly and reallocated at the adviser's discretion.etfarchitect.comalphaarchitect.com
  • 0.77% is below the category median, but cheaper tactical peers exist: ENDW at 0.22%, PBL at 0.45%, GMOD at 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
  • Non-diversified by design and thinly traded, so a small book of ETFs drives results and spreads can run wider than the category's household names.sec.gov
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full MOOD profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

MOOD vs PTBD Holdings

As of

How MOOD and PTBD differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of MOOD and 0.0% of PTBD.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile87.9%

Sector

No Sector split for PTBD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MOOD and PTBD, widest gap first
CountryMore in MOODMore in PTBD
United StatesMOOD +10.9 points
CanadaPTBD +3.4 points
United KingdomPTBD +1.8 points
JapanPTBD +1.5 points
Cayman IslandsPTBD +1.3 points
LuxembourgPTBD +1.2 points
FrancePTBD +1.0 points
TaiwanMOOD +0.5 points
Other countries (24)PTBD +1.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • MOOD99.1%
  • PTBD5.8%

Securities held

  • MOOD12
  • PTBD1,043

Asset class

MOOD
Multi-Asset
PTBD
Fixed Income

Holdings

  • Only in MOOD12
  • In both0
  • Only in PTBD1,043

Only in MOOD

12 securities, 100% of MOOD by weight

  • Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF29.62%
  • iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF24.95%
  • Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund20.13%

Only in PTBD

1,043 securities, 97.5% of PTBD by weight

  • 1261229 BC Ltd 10% 04/15/20320.60%
  • EchoStar Corp 10.75% 11/30/20290.49%
  • Meridian Arc Holdco LLC 6.25% 04/30/20310.48%

Weight gaps

MOOD and PTBD share no securities.

All 5 MOOD holdings⁠All 1,050 PTBD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MOOD vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying MOOD vs PTBD

$3,012

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MOOD 0.77%

    $14,829

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MOOD 0.77%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MOOD $14,829PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearMOODPTBDOverpaying
10$1,371$1,076$295
20$5,205$4,116$1,089
30$14,829$11,817$3,012

Expense ratio

  • 0.77%MOOD
  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

MOOD 14th cheapest of 46 funds

MOOD vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
MOOD 0.35%
PTBD 6.36%, better
Payout (12M)
MOOD $0.15
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
MOOD $0.15
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
MOOD Dec 30, 2025
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
MOOD Dec 31, 2025
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
MOOD Annual
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

MOODAnnual · 3 paymentsAll MOOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.36; Dec 30, 2024 $0.39; Dec 30, 2025 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

MOOD vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MOOD 9.5%PTBD 5.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MOOD 1.78, betterPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MOOD −14.3%since May 2022PTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MOOD 0.95PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • MOODBvsENDWA

    Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOODBvsGMODA

    Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOODBvsRISNA

    Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.