Skip to content

GMOD vs MOOD

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

MOODBNasdaq

Overlap

0.6%by weight

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.27pt a year

GMOD0.50%MOOD0.77%

Avg volume · 30D

MOOD 1.8×the volume

GMOD11.8KMOOD20.8K

GMOD vs MOOD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD+20.0%MOOD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. MOOD +20.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
MOOD 0.77%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
MOOD $161M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%
MOOD +20.0%, better
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
MOOD 0.35%
Holdings
GMOD 20
MOOD 12
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh
MOOD 20.8K sh, better
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
MOOD $44.23
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. MOOD: Cost 71, Risk 61, Mission 40, Tradability 78, Holdings 50, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, MOOD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODMOOD
Cost30% weightA90HigherA71
Mission25% weightA74HigherC40
Risk15% weightA75HigherB61
Tradability15% weightA73A78Higher
Holdings10% weightB64HigherC50
Durability5% weightC49B61Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and MOOD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and MOOD 12th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 12BLGHHCM Defender 500 Index ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 12BMOODRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 14BHIDEAlpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

MOODBRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

MOOD Most tactical funds follow price. MOOD follows the gap between institutional and retail sentiment, averaging four indicators into one equity dial that can swing from 0% to fully invested.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

MOOD The Fund seeks capital appreciation by tactically allocating among ETFs and exchange-traded products covering equities, fixed income, commodities, including gold, and currencies.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • MOOD The engine is written down: four relative sentiment indicators, each scaled 0% to 100%, averaged into the equity allocation. Long only, no leverage.alphaarchitect.cometfarchitect.com
  • Fee of 0.77% sits below the median for tactical allocation funds, with no waiver propping it up, and the fund stands in the upper half of that peer group.
  • Live since 2022 and measured against a stated blend: 40% US aggregate bonds, 30% US large caps, 30% developed markets outside North America.
  • Gold and commodities enter on documented triggers, such as bearish dollar and Fed-policy sentiment, rather than a manager's hunch.alphaarchitect.com

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • MOOD The sentiment inputs are proprietary: you see the resulting weights, not the signal. Allocations are recomputed weekly and reallocated at the adviser's discretion.etfarchitect.comalphaarchitect.com
  • 0.77% is below the category median, but cheaper tactical peers exist: ENDW at 0.22%, PBL at 0.45%, GMOD at 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
  • Non-diversified by design and thinly traded, so a small book of ETFs drives results and spreads can run wider than the category's household names.sec.gov

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full MOOD profile⁠

GMOD vs MOOD Holdings

How GMOD and MOOD differ

Overlap by weight

0.6%

Shared holdings make up 4.8% of GMOD and 0.6% of MOOD.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both0.6%
  • Countryby domicile70.1%

Sector

No Sector split for GMOD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GMOD and MOOD, widest gap first
CountryMore in GMODMore in MOOD
United StatesMOOD +29.9 points
JapanGMOD +6.4 points
CanadaGMOD +3.2 points
United KingdomGMOD +2.6 points
FranceGMOD +2.5 points
TaiwanGMOD +2.4 points
SwitzerlandGMOD +1.8 points
South KoreaGMOD +1.4 points
Other countries (33)GMOD +9.2 points

Outside the US: GMOD 73% developed, 27% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GMOD78.4%
  • MOOD99.1%

Securities held

  • GMOD19
  • MOOD12

Asset class

GMOD
Multi-Asset
MOOD
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in GMOD18
  • In both1
  • Only in MOOD11

Only in GMOD

18 securities, 95.2% of GMOD by weight

  • Ishares 7 10 Year Treasury Bon14.05%
  • Schwab Us Tips Etf10.09%
  • Gmo Us Quality Etf9.98%

Only in MOOD

11 securities, 99.7% of MOOD by weight

  • Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF29.62%
  • iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF24.95%
  • Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund20.13%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GMOD and MOOD, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GMODMore in MOOD
Ishares Core Msci Emerging MarIEMGGMOD +4.20 points

All GMOD holdings⁠All 5 MOOD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs MOOD Cost

Overpaying MOOD vs GMOD

$4,850

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • MOOD 0.77%

    $14,829

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • MOOD 0.77%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MOOD $14,829GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODMOODOverpaying
10$900$1,371$471
20$3,460$5,205$1,745
30$9,979$14,829$4,850

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 0.77%MOOD
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

MOOD 14th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs MOOD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
MOOD 0.35%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
MOOD $0.15
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
MOOD $0.15
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
MOOD Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
MOOD Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
MOOD Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
MOODAnnual · 4 paymentsAll MOOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2022 $0.34; Dec 20, 2023 $0.36; Dec 30, 2024 $0.39; Dec 30, 2025 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

GMOD vs MOOD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025MOOD 9.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025MOOD 1.78
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025MOOD −14.3%since May 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48MOOD 0.95

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOODBvsENDWA

    Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOODBvsPTBDA

    Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOODBvsRISNA

    Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.