Skip to content

ENDW vs NMBL

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF

NMBLDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −1.77pt a year

ENDW0.22%NMBL1.99%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 10.3×the volume

ENDW17.1KNMBL1.66K

ENDW vs NMBL Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+12.7%ENDW+3.0%NMBL

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +12.7%. NMBL +3.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
NMBL 1.99%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
NMBL $24M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%
NMBL No data
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
NMBL No data
Holdings
ENDW 73
NMBL 45
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
NMBL 1.66K sh
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
NMBL $20.38
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. NMBL: Cost 0, Risk 38, Mission 82, Tradability 17, Holdings 79, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, NMBL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWNMBL
Cost30% weightA100HigherF0
Mission25% weightA81A82Higher
Risk15% weightA75HigherD38
Tradability15% weightB69HigherF17
Holdings10% weightB62A79Higher
Durability5% weightB65HigherD33

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and NMBL are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and NMBL 38th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 38DGHTAGoose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETFScore 38
  4. Rank 38DNMBLNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETFScore 38
  5. Rank 40DHFDGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

NMBLDNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

NMBL A go-anywhere active fund: stocks, bonds, any country, emerging markets included, with no fixed allocation to defend. Launched in 2025, it charges 1.99% a year for that freedom.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

NMBL The Fund seeks capital appreciation through active management across multiple asset classes and countries worldwide, including emerging markets.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • NMBL Genuinely unconstrained: the mandate lets management move across asset classes and countries, emerging markets included, instead of defending a fixed 60/40 split.
  • What it owns matches what it promises: the portfolio lines up closely with the global multi-asset mandate written into its prospectus.
  • Plain 1940 Act ETF plumbing: daily liquidity, 1099 tax reporting, no leverage or exotic wrapper bolted onto the strategy.

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • NMBL The fee is the hurdle. At 1.99% a year it sits at the top of the tactical allocation range, where ENDW charges 0.22% and ONOF 0.39%.
  • Launched in 2025, so you are judging a process, not a record. It is also a small fund that trades lightly, which can widen bid-ask spreads.
  • Built around capital appreciation, not cash flow: distributions land once or twice a year rather than monthly or quarterly.

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full NMBL profile⁠

ENDW vs NMBL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs NMBL Cost

Overpaying NMBL vs ENDW

$28,221

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • NMBL 1.99%

    $32,779

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • NMBL 1.99%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K$40K051015202530NMBL $32,779ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWNMBLOverpaying
10$401$3,367$2,966
20$1,561$12,113$10,552
30$4,558$32,779$28,221

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 1.99%NMBL
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

NMBL 46th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs NMBL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
NMBL No data
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
NMBL No data
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
NMBL $0.18
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
NMBL Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
NMBL Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
NMBL Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
NMBLIrregular · 1 paymentAll NMBL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

ENDW vs NMBL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025NMBL No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025NMBL No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025NMBL No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61NMBL 0.66

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NMBLDvsGMODA

    NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.99% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NMBLDvsPTBDA

    NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.99% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NMBLDvsRISNA

    NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.99% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.