PTBD ranks 3rd and NMBL 38th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
NMBL vs PTBD
PTBD −1.39pt a year
1.99%0.60%
PTBD 11.2×the volume
1.66K18.6K
NMBL vs PTBD Performance
+3.0%−0.4%
- NMBL 1.99%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- NMBL $24M
- PTBD $83M
- NMBL
- PTBD −0.1%
- NMBL
- PTBD 6.36%
- NMBL 45
- PTBD 1047
- NMBL 1.66K sh
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- NMBL $20.38
- PTBD $18.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NMBL | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A83Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | D38 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | F17 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | A79 | A90Higher |
| Durability | D33 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. NMBL and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NMBLD
PTBDA
In short
NMBL A go-anywhere active fund: stocks, bonds, any country, emerging markets included, with no fixed allocation to defend. Launched in 2025, it charges 1.99% a year for that freedom.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
NMBL The Fund seeks capital appreciation through active management across multiple asset classes and countries worldwide, including emerging markets.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NMBL vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NMBL vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying NMBL vs PTBD
$20,962
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NMBL 1.99%
$32,779
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NMBL | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,367 | $1,076 | $2,291 |
| 20 | $12,113 | $4,116 | $7,997 |
| 30 | $32,779 | $11,817 | $20,962 |
- 1.99%NMBL
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
NMBL 46th cheapest of 46 funds
NMBL vs PTBD Dividends
- NMBL
- PTBD 6.36%
- NMBL
- PTBD $1.17
- NMBL $0.18
- PTBD $0.10
- NMBL Dec 23, 2025
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- NMBL Dec 24, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- NMBL Irregular
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
NMBL vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NMBL PTBD 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- NMBL PTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- NMBL PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- NMBL 0.66PTBD 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 1.99% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.99% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.99% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.