Skip to content

NMBL vs PTBD

NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF

NMBLDNYSE Arca

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTBD −1.39pt a year

NMBL1.99%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 11.2×the volume

NMBL1.66KPTBD18.6K

NMBL vs PTBD Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.0%NMBL−0.4%PTBD

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. NMBL +3.0%. PTBD −0.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%5%7.5%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NMBL 1.99%
PTBD 0.60%, better
Fund size
NMBL $24M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
NMBL No data
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
NMBL No data
PTBD 6.36%
Holdings
NMBL 45
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
NMBL 1.66K sh
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
NAV per share
NMBL $20.38
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NMBL: Cost 0, Risk 38, Mission 82, Tradability 17, Holdings 79, Durability 33. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for NMBL, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNMBLPTBD
Cost30% weightF0A83Higher
Mission25% weightA82Not scored
Risk15% weightD38B60Higher
Tradability15% weightF17C50Higher
Holdings10% weightA79A90Higher
Durability5% weightD33A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NMBL and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and NMBL 38th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 38DGHTAGoose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETFScore 38
  6. Rank 38DNMBLNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETFScore 38
  7. Rank 40DHFDGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NMBLDNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

NMBL A go-anywhere active fund: stocks, bonds, any country, emerging markets included, with no fixed allocation to defend. Launched in 2025, it charges 1.99% a year for that freedom.

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

NMBL The Fund seeks capital appreciation through active management across multiple asset classes and countries worldwide, including emerging markets.

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

  • NMBL Genuinely unconstrained: the mandate lets management move across asset classes and countries, emerging markets included, instead of defending a fixed 60/40 split.
  • What it owns matches what it promises: the portfolio lines up closely with the global multi-asset mandate written into its prospectus.
  • Plain 1940 Act ETF plumbing: daily liquidity, 1099 tax reporting, no leverage or exotic wrapper bolted onto the strategy.
  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

  • NMBL The fee is the hurdle. At 1.99% a year it sits at the top of the tactical allocation range, where ENDW charges 0.22% and ONOF 0.39%.
  • Launched in 2025, so you are judging a process, not a record. It is also a small fund that trades lightly, which can widen bid-ask spreads.
  • Built around capital appreciation, not cash flow: distributions land once or twice a year rather than monthly or quarterly.
  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full NMBL profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

NMBL vs PTBD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NMBL vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying NMBL vs PTBD

$20,962

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NMBL 1.99%

    $32,779

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NMBL 1.99%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K$40K051015202530NMBL $32,779PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearNMBLPTBDOverpaying
10$3,367$1,076$2,291
20$12,113$4,116$7,997
30$32,779$11,817$20,962

Expense ratio

  • 1.99%NMBL
  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

NMBL 46th cheapest of 46 funds

NMBL vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
NMBL No data
PTBD 6.36%
Payout (12M)
NMBL No data
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
NMBL $0.18
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
NMBL Dec 23, 2025
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
NMBL Dec 24, 2025
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
NMBL Irregular
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

NMBLIrregular · 1 paymentAll NMBL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

NMBL vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NMBL No dataPTBD 5.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NMBL No dataPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NMBL No dataPTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NMBL 0.66PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • NMBLDvsENDWA

    NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.99% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NMBLDvsGMODA

    NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.99% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NMBLDvsRISNA

    NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.99% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.