ENDW ranks 1st and THMR 33rd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
ENDW vs THMR
ENDW −0.88pt a year
0.22%1.10%
ENDW 1.3×the volume
17.1K12.9K
ENDW vs THMR Performance
+0.9%+1.6%
- ENDW 0.22%, better
- THMR 1.10%
- ENDW $160M
- THMR $42M
- ENDW +14.9%
- THMR
- ENDW 2.37%
- THMR
- ENDW 73
- THMR 20
- ENDW 17.1K sh, better
- THMR 12.9K sh
- ENDW $34.35
- THMR $25.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ENDW | THMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F22 |
| Mission | A81Higher | A70 |
| Risk | A75Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | B62 | B68Higher |
| Durability | B65Higher | D33 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. ENDW and THMR are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ENDWA
THMRC
In short
ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.
THMR A machine-learning-assisted tactical allocator that roams across stocks, bonds, commodities and alternatives, and is allowed to reach for leveraged ETFs when it wants more punch. Fully active, unconstrained, and priced like it.
Stated mandate
ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.
THMR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed, risk-managed multi-strategy approach. It dynamically allocates among strategies investing in stocks, ETFs and leveraged ETFs across equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives, using machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ENDW vs THMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ENDW vs THMR Cost
Overpaying THMR vs ENDW
$15,733
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ENDW 0.22%
$4,558
THMR 1.10%
$20,291
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ENDW | THMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $401 | $1,931 | $1,530 |
| 20 | $1,561 | $7,225 | $5,664 |
| 30 | $4,558 | $20,291 | $15,733 |
- 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
- 1.10%THMR
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
ENDW cheapest of 46 funds
THMR 36th cheapest of 46 funds
ENDW vs THMR Dividends
- ENDW 2.37%
- THMR
- ENDW $0.82
- THMR None
- ENDW $0.16
- THMR
- ENDW Sep 28, 2026
- THMR
- ENDW Sep 30, 2026
- THMR
- ENDW Quarterly
- THMR
Distribution history
ENDW vs THMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ENDW 9.2%THMR
- Return per unit of risk
- ENDW 1.99THMR
- Worst fall
- ENDW −6.4%THMR
- Market sensitivity
- ENDW 0.61THMR 1.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.22% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.