Skip to content

ENDW vs THMR

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF

THMRCNYSE

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.88pt a year

ENDW0.22%THMR1.10%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 1.3×the volume

ENDW17.1KTHMR12.9K

ENDW vs THMR Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.9%ENDW+1.6%THMR

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +0.9%. THMR +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.4%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
THMR 1.10%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
THMR $42M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%
THMR No data
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
THMR No data
Holdings
ENDW 73
THMR 20
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
THMR 12.9K sh
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
THMR $25.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. THMR: Cost 22, Risk 28, Mission 70, Tradability 49, Holdings 68, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, THMR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWTHMR
Cost30% weightA100HigherF22
Mission25% weightA81HigherA70
Risk15% weightA75HigherD28
Tradability15% weightB69HigherC49
Holdings10% weightB62B68Higher
Durability5% weightB65HigherD33

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and THMR are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and THMR 33rd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 33CBITCBitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETFScore 44
  4. Rank 33CTHMRTHOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETFScore 44
  5. Rank 35CDYTASGI Dynamic Tactical ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

THMRCTHOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

THMR A machine-learning-assisted tactical allocator that roams across stocks, bonds, commodities and alternatives, and is allowed to reach for leveraged ETFs when it wants more punch. Fully active, unconstrained, and priced like it.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

THMR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed, risk-managed multi-strategy approach. It dynamically allocates among strategies investing in stocks, ETFs and leveraged ETFs across equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives, using machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • THMR One ticker, many markets: the manager can shift among equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives instead of riding a fixed blend.
  • The toolkit includes leveraged ETFs, so exposure can be dialed up or down inside the fund rather than by you placing the trades.
  • Actively managed with machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization, so there is no index to hug when the tape turns.

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • THMR Costs 1.10% a year, above the typical tactical multi-asset fund and well above top-ranked peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%).
  • A small asset base and light trading can mean wider spreads, which shows up most on large or hurried orders.
  • A 2026 launch built for capital appreciation, not income, and leveraged ETF positions amplify moves in both directions.

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full THMR profile⁠

ENDW vs THMR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs THMR Cost

Overpaying THMR vs ENDW

$15,733

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • THMR 1.10%

    $20,291

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • THMR 1.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530THMR $20,291ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWTHMROverpaying
10$401$1,931$1,530
20$1,561$7,225$5,664
30$4,558$20,291$15,733

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 1.10%THMR
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

THMR 36th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs THMR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
THMR No data
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
THMR None
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
THMR No data
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
THMR No data
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
THMR No data
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
THMR No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
THMRAll THMR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ENDW vs THMR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025THMR No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025THMR No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025THMR No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61THMR 1.49

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsGMODA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsPTBDA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsRISNA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.