PTBD ranks 3rd and THMR 33rd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
PTBD vs THMR
PTBD −0.50pt a year
0.60%1.10%
PTBD 1.4×the volume
18.6K12.9K
PTBD vs THMR Performance
−1.6%+1.6%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- THMR 1.10%
- PTBD $83M
- THMR $42M
- PTBD −0.1%
- THMR
- PTBD 6.36%
- THMR
- PTBD 1047
- THMR 20
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- THMR 12.9K sh
- PTBD $18.34
- THMR $25.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PTBD | THMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F22 |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | B60Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | C50Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A90Higher | B68 |
| Durability | A83Higher | D33 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. PTBD and THMR are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PTBDA
THMRC
In short
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
THMR A machine-learning-assisted tactical allocator that roams across stocks, bonds, commodities and alternatives, and is allowed to reach for leveraged ETFs when it wants more punch. Fully active, unconstrained, and priced like it.
Stated mandate
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
THMR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed, risk-managed multi-strategy approach. It dynamically allocates among strategies investing in stocks, ETFs and leveraged ETFs across equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives, using machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PTBD vs THMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PTBD vs THMR Cost
Overpaying THMR vs PTBD
$8,474
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
THMR 1.10%
$20,291
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PTBD | THMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,931 | $855 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $7,225 | $3,109 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $20,291 | $8,474 |
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- 1.10%THMR
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
THMR 36th cheapest of 46 funds
PTBD vs THMR Dividends
- PTBD 6.36%
- THMR
- PTBD $1.17
- THMR None
- PTBD $0.10
- THMR
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- THMR
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- THMR
- PTBD Monthly
- THMR
Distribution history
PTBD vs THMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PTBD 5.2%THMR
- Return per unit of risk
- PTBD 0.08THMR
- Worst fall
- PTBD −24.8%THMR
- Market sensitivity
- PTBD 0.74THMR 1.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.