Skip to content

PTBD vs THMR

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF

THMRCNYSE

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTBD −0.50pt a year

PTBD0.60%THMR1.10%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 1.4×the volume

PTBD18.6KTHMR12.9K

PTBD vs THMR Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.6%PTBD+1.6%THMR

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. PTBD −1.6%. THMR +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%4%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PTBD 0.60%, better
THMR 1.10%
Fund size
PTBD $83M
THMR $42M
1Y total return
PTBD −0.1%
THMR No data
Yield (12M)
PTBD 6.36%
THMR No data
Holdings
PTBD 1047
THMR 20
Avg volume (30D)
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
THMR 12.9K sh
NAV per share
PTBD $18.34
THMR $25.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83. THMR: Cost 22, Risk 28, Mission 70, Tradability 49, Holdings 68, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for PTBD, THMR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPTBDTHMR
Cost30% weightA83HigherF22
Mission25% weightNot scoredA70
Risk15% weightB60HigherD28
Tradability15% weightC50HigherC49
Holdings10% weightA90HigherB68
Durability5% weightA83HigherD33

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PTBD and THMR are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and THMR 33rd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 33CBITCBitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETFScore 44
  6. Rank 33CTHMRTHOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETFScore 44
  7. Rank 35CDYTASGI Dynamic Tactical ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

THMRCTHOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF

In short

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

THMR A machine-learning-assisted tactical allocator that roams across stocks, bonds, commodities and alternatives, and is allowed to reach for leveraged ETFs when it wants more punch. Fully active, unconstrained, and priced like it.

Stated mandate

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

THMR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed, risk-managed multi-strategy approach. It dynamically allocates among strategies investing in stocks, ETFs and leveraged ETFs across equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives, using machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization.

Why people hold it

  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.
  • THMR One ticker, many markets: the manager can shift among equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives instead of riding a fixed blend.
  • The toolkit includes leveraged ETFs, so exposure can be dialed up or down inside the fund rather than by you placing the trades.
  • Actively managed with machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization, so there is no index to hug when the tape turns.

Worth knowing

  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.
  • THMR Costs 1.10% a year, above the typical tactical multi-asset fund and well above top-ranked peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%).
  • A small asset base and light trading can mean wider spreads, which shows up most on large or hurried orders.
  • A 2026 launch built for capital appreciation, not income, and leveraged ETF positions amplify moves in both directions.

Full PTBD profile⁠

Full THMR profile⁠

PTBD vs THMR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PTBD vs THMR Cost

Overpaying THMR vs PTBD

$8,474

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

  • THMR 1.10%

    $20,291

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PTBD 0.60%
  • THMR 1.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530THMR $20,291PTBD $11,817

Year by year

YearPTBDTHMROverpaying
10$1,076$1,931$855
20$4,116$7,225$3,109
30$11,817$20,291$8,474

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
  • 1.10%THMR
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

THMR 36th cheapest of 46 funds

PTBD vs THMR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PTBD 6.36%
THMR No data
Payout (12M)
PTBD $1.17
THMR None
Last payment
PTBD $0.10
THMR No data
Ex-dividend
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
THMR No data
Paid on
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
THMR No data
Frequency
PTBD Monthly
THMR No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
THMRAll THMR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PTBD vs THMR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PTBD 5.2%THMR No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PTBD 0.08THMR No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PTBD −24.8%THMR No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PTBD 0.74THMR 1.49

Popular comparisons

  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsENDWA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsGMODA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsRISNA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.