GMOD ranks 2nd and THMR 33rd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GMOD vs THMR
GMOD −0.60pt a year
0.50%1.10%
THMR 1.1×the volume
11.8K12.9K
GMOD vs THMR Performance
+0.8%+1.6%
- GMOD 0.50%, better
- THMR 1.10%
- GMOD $49M
- THMR $42M
- GMOD +11.8%
- THMR
- GMOD 20
- THMR 20
- GMOD 11.8K sh
- THMR 12.9K sh, better
- GMOD $27.77
- THMR $25.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOD | THMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | F22 |
| Mission | A74Higher | A70 |
| Risk | A75Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | B64 | B68Higher |
| Durability | C49Higher | D33 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GMOD and THMR are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMODA
THMRC
In short
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
THMR A machine-learning-assisted tactical allocator that roams across stocks, bonds, commodities and alternatives, and is allowed to reach for leveraged ETFs when it wants more punch. Fully active, unconstrained, and priced like it.
Stated mandate
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
THMR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed, risk-managed multi-strategy approach. It dynamically allocates among strategies investing in stocks, ETFs and leveraged ETFs across equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives, using machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOD vs THMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOD vs THMR Cost
Overpaying THMR vs GMOD
$10,312
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
THMR 1.10%
$20,291
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOD | THMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,931 | $1,031 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $7,225 | $3,765 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $20,291 | $10,312 |
- 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
- 1.10%THMR
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
THMR 36th cheapest of 46 funds
GMOD vs THMR Dividends
- GMOD
- THMR None
- GMOD $0.14
- THMR
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- THMR
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- THMR
- GMOD Twice a year
- THMR
Distribution history
GMOD vs THMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOD 8.7%THMR
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOD 0.89THMR
- Worst fall
- GMOD −6.5%THMR
- Market sensitivity
- GMOD 0.48THMR 1.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.