Skip to content

GMOD vs THMR

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF

THMRCNYSE

Overlap

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.60pt a year

GMOD0.50%THMR1.10%

Avg volume · 30D

THMR 1.1×the volume

GMOD11.8KTHMR12.9K

GMOD vs THMR Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.8%GMOD+1.6%THMR

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +0.8%. THMR +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.4%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
THMR 1.10%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
THMR $42M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%
THMR No data
Holdings
GMOD 20
THMR 20
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh
THMR 12.9K sh, better
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
THMR $25.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. THMR: Cost 22, Risk 28, Mission 70, Tradability 49, Holdings 68, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, THMR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODTHMR
Cost30% weightA90HigherF22
Mission25% weightA74HigherA70
Risk15% weightA75HigherD28
Tradability15% weightA73HigherC49
Holdings10% weightB64B68Higher
Durability5% weightC49HigherD33

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and THMR are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and THMR 33rd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 33CBITCBitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETFScore 44
  5. Rank 33CTHMRTHOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETFScore 44
  6. Rank 35CDYTASGI Dynamic Tactical ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

THMRCTHOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

THMR A machine-learning-assisted tactical allocator that roams across stocks, bonds, commodities and alternatives, and is allowed to reach for leveraged ETFs when it wants more punch. Fully active, unconstrained, and priced like it.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

THMR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed, risk-managed multi-strategy approach. It dynamically allocates among strategies investing in stocks, ETFs and leveraged ETFs across equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives, using machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • THMR One ticker, many markets: the manager can shift among equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives instead of riding a fixed blend.
  • The toolkit includes leveraged ETFs, so exposure can be dialed up or down inside the fund rather than by you placing the trades.
  • Actively managed with machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization, so there is no index to hug when the tape turns.

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • THMR Costs 1.10% a year, above the typical tactical multi-asset fund and well above top-ranked peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%).
  • A small asset base and light trading can mean wider spreads, which shows up most on large or hurried orders.
  • A 2026 launch built for capital appreciation, not income, and leveraged ETF positions amplify moves in both directions.

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full THMR profile⁠

GMOD vs THMR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs THMR Cost

Overpaying THMR vs GMOD

$10,312

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • THMR 1.10%

    $20,291

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • THMR 1.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530THMR $20,291GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODTHMROverpaying
10$900$1,931$1,031
20$3,460$7,225$3,765
30$9,979$20,291$10,312

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 1.10%THMR
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

THMR 36th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs THMR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
THMR None
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
THMR No data
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
THMR No data
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
THMR No data
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
THMR No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
THMRAll THMR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GMOD vs THMR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025THMR No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025THMR No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025THMR No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48THMR 1.49

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsENDWA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsPTBDA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsRISNA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.