Skip to content

ENDW vs TSPX

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF

TSPXCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.82pt a year

ENDW0.22%TSPX1.04%

Avg volume · 30D

TSPX 1.1×the volume

ENDW17.1KTSPX18.4K

ENDW vs TSPX Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 29, 2026

+13.5%ENDW+10.5%TSPX

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 29, 2026. ENDW +13.5%. TSPX +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
TSPX 1.04%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
TSPX $241M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%, better
TSPX +10.7%
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
TSPX No data
Holdings
ENDW 73
TSPX 4
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh
TSPX 18.4K sh, better
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
TSPX $30.17
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. TSPX: Cost 27, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings 34, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, TSPX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWTSPX
Cost30% weightA100HigherD27
Mission25% weightA81Not scored
Risk15% weightA75HigherB67
Tradability15% weightB69HigherB63
Holdings10% weightB62HigherD34
Durability5% weightB65B67Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and TSPX are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and TSPX 32nd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 29CMPROMonarch ProCap ETFScore 47
  4. Rank 32CTSPXTwin Oak Active Opportunities ETFScore 45
  5. Rank 33CBITCBitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

TSPXCTwin Oak Active Opportunities ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

TSPX No data

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

TSPX No data

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.

TSPX No data

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.

TSPX No data

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full TSPX profile⁠

ENDW vs TSPX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs TSPX Cost

Overpaying TSPX vs ENDW

$14,776

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • TSPX 1.04%

    $19,334

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • TSPX 1.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TSPX $19,334ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWTSPXOverpaying
10$401$1,831$1,430
20$1,561$6,867$5,306
30$4,558$19,334$14,776

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 1.04%TSPX
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

TSPX 34th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs TSPX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
TSPX No data
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
TSPX No data
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
TSPX $0.60
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
TSPX Dec 31, 2025
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
TSPX No data
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
TSPX Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
TSPXIrregular · 1 paymentAll TSPX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2025 $0.60. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

ENDW vs TSPX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025TSPX 8.9%since Mar 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025TSPX 1.32since Mar 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025TSPX −6.9%since Feb 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61TSPX 0.69

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSPXCvsGMODA

    Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.04% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSPXCvsPTBDA

    Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.04% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSPXCvsRISNA

    Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.04% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.