Skip to content

GMOD vs TSPX

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF

TSPXCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.54pt a year

GMOD0.50%TSPX1.04%

Avg volume · 30D

TSPX 1.6×the volume

GMOD11.8KTSPX18.4K

GMOD vs TSPX Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 29, 2026

+9.3%GMOD+10.5%TSPX

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 29, 2026. GMOD +9.3%. TSPX +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
TSPX 1.04%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
TSPX $241M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%, better
TSPX +10.7%
Holdings
GMOD 20
TSPX 4
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh
TSPX 18.4K sh, better
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
TSPX $30.17
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. TSPX: Cost 27, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings 34, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, TSPX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODTSPX
Cost30% weightA90HigherD27
Mission25% weightA74Not scored
Risk15% weightA75HigherB67
Tradability15% weightA73HigherB63
Holdings10% weightB64HigherD34
Durability5% weightC49B67Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and TSPX are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and TSPX 32nd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 29CMPROMonarch ProCap ETFScore 47
  5. Rank 32CTSPXTwin Oak Active Opportunities ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 33CBITCBitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

TSPXCTwin Oak Active Opportunities ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

TSPX No data

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

TSPX No data

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.

TSPX No data

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.

TSPX No data

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full TSPX profile⁠

GMOD vs TSPX Holdings

How GMOD and TSPX differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GMOD and 0.0% of TSPX.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile67.6%

Sector

No Sector split for GMOD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GMOD and TSPX, widest gap first
CountryMore in GMODMore in TSPX
United StatesTSPX +32.4 points
JapanGMOD +6.6 points
CanadaGMOD +3.3 points
TaiwanGMOD +2.9 points
United KingdomGMOD +2.9 points
FranceGMOD +2.6 points
SwitzerlandGMOD +1.8 points
South KoreaGMOD +1.7 points
Other countries (33)GMOD +10.4 points

Outside the US: GMOD 73% developed, 27% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GMOD78.4%
  • TSPX100.0%

Securities held

  • GMOD19
  • TSPX3

Asset class

GMOD
Multi-Asset
TSPX
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GMOD19
  • In both0
  • Only in TSPX3

Only in GMOD

19 securities, 100% of GMOD by weight

  • Ishares 7 10 Year Treasury Bon14.05%
  • Schwab Us Tips Etf10.09%
  • Gmo Us Quality Etf9.98%

Only in TSPX

3 securities, 99.6% of TSPX by weight

  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF83.05%
  • JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF8.70%
  • iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF7.83%

Weight gaps

GMOD and TSPX share no securities.

All GMOD holdings⁠All 5 TSPX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs TSPX Cost

Overpaying TSPX vs GMOD

$9,355

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • TSPX 1.04%

    $19,334

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • TSPX 1.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TSPX $19,334GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODTSPXOverpaying
10$900$1,831$931
20$3,460$6,867$3,407
30$9,979$19,334$9,355

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 1.04%TSPX
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

TSPX 34th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs TSPX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
TSPX $0.60
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
TSPX Dec 31, 2025
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
TSPX No data
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
TSPX Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
TSPXIrregular · 1 paymentAll TSPX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2025 $0.60. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

GMOD vs TSPX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025TSPX 8.9%since Mar 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025TSPX 1.32since Mar 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025TSPX −6.9%since Feb 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48TSPX 0.69

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSPXCvsENDWA

    Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.04% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSPXCvsPTBDA

    Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.04% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSPXCvsRISNA

    Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.04% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.