Skip to content

ENDW vs XFLX

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

FundX Flexible ETF

XFLXCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.8%by weight

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.75pt a year

ENDW0.22%XFLX0.97%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 7.3×the volume

ENDW17.1KXFLX2.35K

ENDW vs XFLX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.9%ENDW+1.1%XFLX

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +14.9%. XFLX +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
XFLX 0.97%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
XFLX $50M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%, better
XFLX +1.1%
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
XFLX 9.72%, better
Holdings
ENDW 73
XFLX 14
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
XFLX 2.35K sh
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
XFLX $22.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. XFLX: Cost 39, Risk 57, Mission 69, Tradability 53, Holdings 55, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, XFLX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWXFLX
Cost30% weightA100HigherD39
Mission25% weightA81HigherB69
Risk15% weightA75HigherB57
Tradability15% weightB69HigherC53
Holdings10% weightB62HigherB55
Durability5% weightB65B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and XFLX are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and XFLX 24th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 21BUSAFAtlas America FundScore 55
  4. Rank 24CXFLXFundX Flexible ETFScore 54
  5. Rank 25CKAMOKensington Credit Opportunities ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

XFLXCFundX Flexible ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

XFLX An ETF-of-ETFs running FundX's old Upgrading playbook: own the parts of the bond market that are leading, sell the ones that fade. Same strategy since 2002, now in an ETF wrapper, at 0.97%.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

XFLX The available SEC record presents XFLX as a core-growth allocation vehicle. The retrieved evidence does not identify a single benchmark, sector, or thematic mandate.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • XFLX Veteran playbook: Upgrading (hold the leaders, sell the laggards) has run this portfolio since its 2002 start as a mutual fund, across several full market cycles.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • One ticker, many bond markets: it owns other ETFs across maturities, credit quality (high yield included) and regions, reshuffled as leadership rotates.usnews.com
  • Mandate is total return, capital appreciation plus current income, with no index to hug. The manager moves the mix rather than tracking a fixed basket.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • XFLX Costs stack: 0.97% at the fund level, plus the fees of the ETFs it holds. Tactical peers run cheaper, including ENDW at 0.22% and GMOD at 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
  • Small fund, thin tape. Spreads can run wider than in big index ETFs, so how you place an order matters more here.
  • Judgment, not a rulebook: the SEC record ties it to no single benchmark, sector or theme, so what you own depends on the manager's current read of market leadership.sec.gov

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full XFLX profile⁠

ENDW vs XFLX Holdings

How ENDW and XFLX differ

Overlap by weight

0.8%

Shared holdings make up 2.0% of ENDW and 1.0% of XFLX.

Level by level

  • Asset classEquity, Fixed Income0.0%
  • Holdings1 in both0.8%
  • Countryby domicile58.9%
  • Sector11 Sectors80.5%

Sector

Sector weights in ENDW and XFLX, widest gap first
SectorMore in ENDWMore in XFLX
EnergyENDW +9.3 points
IndustrialsXFLX +5.3 points
Health CareXFLX +5.2 points
Real EstateENDW +4.9 points
CommunicationXFLX +4.9 points
TechnologyXFLX +3.4 points
FinancialsENDW +2.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryENDW +2.1 points
UtilitiesENDW +0.6 points
Consumer StaplesXFLX +0.5 points
MaterialsXFLX +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ENDW and XFLX, widest gap first
CountryMore in ENDWMore in XFLX
United StatesXFLX +41.1 points
South AfricaENDW +3.9 points
JapanENDW +3.8 points
United KingdomENDW +3.7 points
ChinaENDW +3.4 points
TaiwanENDW +3.3 points
CanadaENDW +2.9 points
South KoreaENDW +1.9 points
Other countries (28)ENDW +18.2 points

Outside the US: ENDW 52% developed, 48% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ENDW72.8%
  • XFLX91.9%

Securities held

  • ENDW72
  • XFLX13

Asset class

ENDW
Equity
XFLX
Fixed Income

Holdings

  • Only in ENDW71
  • In both1
  • Only in XFLX12

Only in ENDW

71 securities, 98.0% of ENDW by weight

  • US 10YR NOTE (CBT)Dec2622.47%
  • Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF10.21%
  • Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF7.99%

Only in XFLX

12 securities, 99.0% of XFLX by weight

  • PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund10.64%
  • VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF9.66%
  • iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF9.61%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ENDW and XFLX, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ENDWMore in XFLX
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031ENDW +1.24 points

All 72 ENDW holdings⁠All XFLX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs XFLX Cost

Overpaying XFLX vs ENDW

$13,640

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • XFLX 0.97%

    $18,198

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • XFLX 0.97%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XFLX $18,198ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWXFLXOverpaying
10$401$1,712$1,311
20$1,561$6,443$4,882
30$4,558$18,198$13,640

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 0.97%XFLX
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

XFLX 28th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs XFLX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
XFLX 9.72%, better
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
XFLX $2.19
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
XFLX $2.19
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
XFLX Dec 31, 2025
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
XFLX Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
XFLX Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD
XFLXAnnual · 3 paymentsAll XFLX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2023 $0.98; Dec 31, 2024 $1.09; Dec 31, 2025 $2.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

ENDW vs XFLX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025XFLX 3.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025XFLX −0.11
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025XFLX −6.6%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61XFLX 0.61Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XFLXCvsGMODA

    FundX Flexible ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.97% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XFLXCvsPTBDA

    FundX Flexible ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.97% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XFLXCvsRISNA

    FundX Flexible ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.97% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.