PTBD ranks 3rd and XFLX 24th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
PTBD vs XFLX
PTBD −0.37pt a year
0.60%0.97%
PTBD 7.9×the volume
18.6K2.35K
PTBD +0.8pt
+4.9%+4.1%
PTBD vs XFLX Performance
−0.1%+1.1%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- XFLX 0.97%
- PTBD $83M
- XFLX $50M
- PTBD −0.1%
- XFLX +1.1%, better
- PTBD 6.36%
- XFLX 9.72%, better
- PTBD 1047
- XFLX 14
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- XFLX 2.35K sh
- PTBD $18.34
- XFLX $22.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PTBD | XFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | D39 |
| Mission | B69 | |
| Risk | B60Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | C50 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | A90Higher | B55 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B68 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. PTBD and XFLX are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PTBDA
XFLXC
In short
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
XFLX An ETF-of-ETFs running FundX's old Upgrading playbook: own the parts of the bond market that are leading, sell the ones that fade. Same strategy since 2002, now in an ETF wrapper, at 0.97%.
Stated mandate
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
XFLX The available SEC record presents XFLX as a core-growth allocation vehicle. The retrieved evidence does not identify a single benchmark, sector, or thematic mandate.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PTBD vs XFLX Holdings
How PTBD and XFLX differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country86.1%
Sector
No Sector split for PTBD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PTBDMore in XFLX | PTBD | XFLX |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | XFLX +13.9 points | 86.1% | 100.0% |
| Canada | PTBD +3.5 points | 3.5% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | PTBD +2.1 points | 2.1% | 0.0% |
| Japan | PTBD +1.7 points | 1.7% | 0.0% |
| Cayman Islands | PTBD +1.4 points | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Luxembourg | PTBD +1.2 points | 1.2% | 0.0% |
| France | PTBD +1.1 points | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| Netherlands | PTBD +0.7 points | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (10) | PTBD +2.2 points | 2.2% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- PTBD5.8%
- XFLX91.9%
- PTBD1,043
- XFLX13
Asset class
- PTBD
- Fixed Income
- XFLX
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. PTBD holds 1,043 securities, XFLX 13.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PTBD vs XFLX Cost
Overpaying XFLX vs PTBD
$6,381
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
XFLX 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PTBD | XFLX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,712 | $636 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $6,443 | $2,327 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $18,198 | $6,381 |
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- 0.97%XFLX
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
XFLX 28th cheapest of 46 funds
PTBD vs XFLX Dividends
- PTBD 6.36%
- XFLX 9.72%, better
- PTBD $1.17
- XFLX $2.19
- PTBD $0.10
- XFLX $2.19
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- XFLX Dec 31, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- XFLX Jan 2, 2026
- PTBD Monthly
- XFLX Annual
Distribution history
PTBD vs XFLX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PTBD 5.2%XFLX 3.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PTBD 0.08, betterXFLX −0.11
- Worst fall
- PTBD −24.8%XFLX −6.6%
- Market sensitivity
- PTBD 0.74XFLX 0.61
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.