GMOD ranks 2nd and XFLX 24th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GMOD vs XFLX
0.0%by weight
GMOD −0.47pt a year
0.50%0.97%
GMOD 5.0×the volume
11.8K2.35K
GMOD vs XFLX Performance
+11.8%+1.1%
- GMOD 0.50%, better
- XFLX 0.97%
- GMOD $49M
- XFLX $50M
- GMOD +11.8%, better
- XFLX +1.1%
- GMOD
- XFLX 9.72%
- GMOD 20
- XFLX 14
- GMOD 11.8K sh, better
- XFLX 2.35K sh
- GMOD $27.77
- XFLX $22.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOD | XFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | D39 |
| Mission | A74Higher | B69 |
| Risk | A75Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | B64Higher | B55 |
| Durability | C49 | B68Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GMOD and XFLX are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMODA
XFLXC
In short
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
XFLX An ETF-of-ETFs running FundX's old Upgrading playbook: own the parts of the bond market that are leading, sell the ones that fade. Same strategy since 2002, now in an ETF wrapper, at 0.97%.
Stated mandate
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
XFLX The available SEC record presents XFLX as a core-growth allocation vehicle. The retrieved evidence does not identify a single benchmark, sector, or thematic mandate.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOD vs XFLX Holdings
How GMOD and XFLX differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GMOD and 0.0% of XFLX.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Country67.1%
Sector
No Sector split for GMOD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in GMODMore in XFLX | GMOD | XFLX |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | XFLX +32.9 points | 67.1% | 100.0% |
| Japan | GMOD +6.6 points | 6.6% | 0.0% |
| Canada | GMOD +3.3 points | 3.3% | 0.0% |
| Taiwan | GMOD +2.9 points | 2.9% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | GMOD +2.9 points | 2.9% | 0.0% |
| France | GMOD +2.6 points | 2.6% | 0.0% |
| Switzerland | GMOD +2.1 points | 2.1% | 0.0% |
| South Korea | GMOD +1.7 points | 1.7% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (33) | GMOD +10.6 points | 10.6% | 0.0% |
Outside the US: GMOD 73% developed, 27% emerging.
Concentration
- GMOD78.4%
- XFLX91.9%
- GMOD19
- XFLX13
Asset class
- GMOD
- Multi-Asset
- XFLX
- Fixed Income
Holdings
- Only in GMOD19
- In both0
- Only in XFLX13
Only in GMOD
19 securities, 100% of GMOD by weight
- Ishares 7 10 Year Treasury Bon14.05%
- Schwab Us Tips Etf10.09%
- Gmo Us Quality Etf9.98%
- Gmo International Value Etf9.90%
- Gmo Us Value Etf9.28%
- Gmo International Quality Etf5.18%
- Vanguard Intermediate Term Tre5.03%
- Schwab Intermediate Term U.s.5.03%
- State Street Spdr Portfolio In5.03%
- Ishares Core Msci Emerging Mar4.80%
- Gmo Domestic Resilience Etf4.08%
- Ishares Msci Japan Value Etf4.06%
- Ishares Core Msci Internationa2.97%
- Ishares Msci Emerging Markets2.85%
- Vanguard Short Term Treasury E2.49%
- Ishares Msci Eafe Small Cap Et1.95%
- Gmo Power Infrastructure Etf1.85%
- Vanguard Total International’s1.13%
- State Str Instl Invt Tr0.24%
Only in XFLX
13 securities, 99.7% of XFLX by weight
- PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund10.64%
- VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF9.66%
- iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF9.61%
- PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Exchange-Traded Fund9.56%
- Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF9.50%
- Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF9.07%
- State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF8.58%
- iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF8.57%
- NYLIM Merger Arbitrage ETF8.46%
- iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF8.21%
- iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF7.15%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.69%
- VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF0.05%
Weight gaps
GMOD and XFLX share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOD vs XFLX Cost
Overpaying XFLX vs GMOD
$8,219
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
XFLX 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOD | XFLX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,712 | $812 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,443 | $2,983 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $18,198 | $8,219 |
- 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
- 0.97%XFLX
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
XFLX 28th cheapest of 46 funds
GMOD vs XFLX Dividends
- GMOD
- XFLX 9.72%
- GMOD
- XFLX $2.19
- GMOD $0.14
- XFLX $2.19
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- XFLX Dec 31, 2025
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- XFLX Jan 2, 2026
- GMOD Twice a year
- XFLX Annual
Distribution history
GMOD vs XFLX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOD 8.7%XFLX 3.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOD 0.89XFLX −0.11
- Worst fall
- GMOD −6.5%XFLX −6.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GMOD 0.48XFLX 0.61
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.