Skip to content

GMOD vs XFLX

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

FundX Flexible ETF

XFLXCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.47pt a year

GMOD0.50%XFLX0.97%

Avg volume · 30D

GMOD 5.0×the volume

GMOD11.8KXFLX2.35K

GMOD vs XFLX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GMOD+1.1%XFLX

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GMOD +11.8%. XFLX +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%7.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
XFLX 0.97%
Fund size
GMOD $49M
XFLX $50M
1Y total return
GMOD +11.8%, better
XFLX +1.1%
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
XFLX 9.72%
Holdings
GMOD 20
XFLX 14
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh, better
XFLX 2.35K sh
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
XFLX $22.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. XFLX: Cost 39, Risk 57, Mission 69, Tradability 53, Holdings 55, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, XFLX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODXFLX
Cost30% weightA90HigherD39
Mission25% weightA74HigherB69
Risk15% weightA75HigherB57
Tradability15% weightA73HigherC53
Holdings10% weightB64HigherB55
Durability5% weightC49B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and XFLX are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and XFLX 24th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 21BUSAFAtlas America FundScore 55
  5. Rank 24CXFLXFundX Flexible ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 25CKAMOKensington Credit Opportunities ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

XFLXCFundX Flexible ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

XFLX An ETF-of-ETFs running FundX's old Upgrading playbook: own the parts of the bond market that are leading, sell the ones that fade. Same strategy since 2002, now in an ETF wrapper, at 0.97%.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

XFLX The available SEC record presents XFLX as a core-growth allocation vehicle. The retrieved evidence does not identify a single benchmark, sector, or thematic mandate.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • XFLX Veteran playbook: Upgrading (hold the leaders, sell the laggards) has run this portfolio since its 2002 start as a mutual fund, across several full market cycles.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • One ticker, many bond markets: it owns other ETFs across maturities, credit quality (high yield included) and regions, reshuffled as leadership rotates.usnews.com
  • Mandate is total return, capital appreciation plus current income, with no index to hug. The manager moves the mix rather than tracking a fixed basket.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • XFLX Costs stack: 0.97% at the fund level, plus the fees of the ETFs it holds. Tactical peers run cheaper, including ENDW at 0.22% and GMOD at 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
  • Small fund, thin tape. Spreads can run wider than in big index ETFs, so how you place an order matters more here.
  • Judgment, not a rulebook: the SEC record ties it to no single benchmark, sector or theme, so what you own depends on the manager's current read of market leadership.sec.gov

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full XFLX profile⁠

GMOD vs XFLX Holdings

How GMOD and XFLX differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GMOD and 0.0% of XFLX.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile67.1%

Sector

No Sector split for GMOD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GMOD and XFLX, widest gap first
CountryMore in GMODMore in XFLX
United StatesXFLX +32.9 points
JapanGMOD +6.6 points
CanadaGMOD +3.3 points
TaiwanGMOD +2.9 points
United KingdomGMOD +2.9 points
FranceGMOD +2.6 points
SwitzerlandGMOD +2.1 points
South KoreaGMOD +1.7 points
Other countries (33)GMOD +10.6 points

Outside the US: GMOD 73% developed, 27% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GMOD78.4%
  • XFLX91.9%

Securities held

  • GMOD19
  • XFLX13

Asset class

GMOD
Multi-Asset
XFLX
Fixed Income

Holdings

  • Only in GMOD19
  • In both0
  • Only in XFLX13

Only in GMOD

19 securities, 100% of GMOD by weight

  • Ishares 7 10 Year Treasury Bon14.05%
  • Schwab Us Tips Etf10.09%
  • Gmo Us Quality Etf9.98%

Only in XFLX

13 securities, 99.7% of XFLX by weight

  • PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund10.64%
  • VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF9.66%
  • iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF9.61%

Weight gaps

GMOD and XFLX share no securities.

All GMOD holdings⁠All XFLX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs XFLX Cost

Overpaying XFLX vs GMOD

$8,219

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • XFLX 0.97%

    $18,198

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • XFLX 0.97%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XFLX $18,198GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODXFLXOverpaying
10$900$1,712$812
20$3,460$6,443$2,983
30$9,979$18,198$8,219

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 0.97%XFLX
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

XFLX 28th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs XFLX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
XFLX 9.72%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
XFLX $2.19
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
XFLX $2.19
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
XFLX Dec 31, 2025
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
XFLX Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
XFLX Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD
XFLXAnnual · 3 paymentsAll XFLX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2023 $0.98; Dec 31, 2024 $1.09; Dec 31, 2025 $2.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

GMOD vs XFLX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025XFLX 3.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025XFLX −0.11
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025XFLX −6.6%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48XFLX 0.61

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XFLXCvsENDWA

    FundX Flexible ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.97% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XFLXCvsPTBDA

    FundX Flexible ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.97% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XFLXCvsRISNA

    FundX Flexible ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.97% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.