FLKR ranks 15th and ENZL 22nd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
ENZL vs FLKR
FLKR −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
FLKR 12.8×the volume
65.1K830K
FLKR +20.8pt
−4.7%+16.1%
ENZL vs FLKR Performance
−21.3%+110.9%
- ENZL 0.50%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- ENZL $65M
- FLKR $1.79B
- ENZL −0.2%
- FLKR +62.5%, better
- ENZL 2.26%
- FLKR 2.92%, better
- ENZL 29
- FLKR 148
- ENZL 65.1K sh
- FLKR 830K sh, better
- ENZL $44.95
- FLKR $51.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ENZL | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | C49 | B57Higher |
| Risk | D37Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | C54Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | D28 | C50Higher |
| Durability | C47 | B60Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. ENZL and FLKR are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ENZLC
FLKRB
In short
ENZL The rare single-ticker route to New Zealand stocks: a compact basket of about 25 NZ names, run by iShares since 2010. Not a Pacific blend, not Australia with a garnish. Just New Zealand.
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
Stated mandate
ENZL The fund seeks to track an index of New Zealand equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in that single country.
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ENZL vs FLKR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ENZL vs FLKR Cost
Overpaying ENZL vs FLKR
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ENZL 0.50%
$9,979
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ENZL | FLKR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%ENZL
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
ENZL 14th cheapest of 38 funds
ENZL vs FLKR Dividends
- ENZL 2.26%
- FLKR 2.92%, better
- ENZL $1.01
- FLKR $1.47
- ENZL $0.44
- FLKR $0.30
- ENZL Jun 15, 2026
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- ENZL Jun 18, 2026
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- ENZL Twice a year
- FLKR Twice a year
Distribution history
ENZL vs FLKR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ENZL
- FLKR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ENZL 15.1%, betterFLKR 43.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ENZL 0.10FLKR 0.97, better
- Worst fall
- ENZL −35.9%, betterFLKR −41.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ENZL 0.91FLKR 2.57
ENZL and FLKR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





