Skip to content

EOCT vs TJUN

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

EOCTBNYSE Arca

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June

TJUNDCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

EOCT −0.06pt a year

EOCT0.89%TJUN0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

EOCT 2.6×the volume

EOCT14.6KTJUN5.54K

EOCT vs TJUN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+7.7%EOCT−2.4%TJUN

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. EOCT +7.7%. TJUN −2.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
EOCT 0.89%, better
TJUN 0.95%
Fund size
EOCT $125M
TJUN $12M
1Y total return
EOCT +7.7%, better
TJUN −2.4%
Holdings
EOCT 3
TJUN 3
Avg volume (30D)
EOCT 14.6K sh, better
TJUN 5.54K sh
NAV per share
EOCT $33.43
TJUN $21.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EOCT: Cost 47, Risk 73, Mission 91, Tradability 76, Holdings not scored, Durability 80. TJUN: Cost 17, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for EOCT, TJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEOCTTJUN
Cost30% weightC47HigherF17
Mission25% weightA91Not scored
Risk15% weightA73HigherC42
Tradability15% weightA76HigherB59
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA80HigherB60

Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EOCT and TJUN are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Emerging Markets Buffer⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

EOCT ranks 1st and TJUN 13th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BEBUFInnovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETFScore 62
  2. Rank 1BEOCTInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BEJANInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 61
  4. Rank 9CEMMYCorgi Emerging Markets Equities Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 13DTJUNFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - JuneScore 35
  6. Rank 14FARKTARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETFScore 14

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EOCTBInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

TJUNDFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June

In short

EOCT Buffer ETFs mostly babysit the S&P 500. EOCT aims the same machinery at emerging markets: upside in the iShares MSCI EM ETF up to a cap, with the first 15% of a drop absorbed, then a reset every October.

TJUN No data

Stated mandate

EOCT The fund seeks capped exposure to the iShares MSCI EM ETF while protecting against the first 15% of losses during each approximately annual outcome period. It resets at the end of each period and may be held indefinitely.

TJUN No data

Why people hold it

  • EOCT Downside buffer where it is rare. Defined-outcome funds cluster around US large caps; this one applies a 15% buffer to emerging market stocks via the iShares MSCI EM ETF.innovatoretfs.com
  • The rules are fixed, not discretionary: 15% of losses absorbed and upside capped over each roughly one-year period, which resets on October 1. No manager judgment calls mid-period.innovatoretfs.com
  • October is one rung of a ladder. Innovator runs the same emerging markets buffer on January, April and July start dates (EJAN, EAPR, EJUL), so entry points can be staggered.innovatoretfs.cominnovatoretfs.com 2
  • At 0.89%, the fee sits right at the middle of the buffer-ETF pack, not at the expensive end.

TJUN No data

Worth knowing

  • EOCT Protection is rented, not free: the cap is reset each October off option prices at that moment. Emerging market swings can be violent, and the buffer sits before fees.innovatoretfs.com
  • It tracks the reference ETF's price move, so emerging market dividends are not passed through. The fund has not been paying distributions.
  • Small and lightly traded, and buying mid-period means your own buffer and cap differ from the headline numbers. Limit orders and a look at the issuer's daily figures help.innovatoretfs.com

TJUN No data

Full EOCT profile⁠

Full TJUN profile⁠

EOCT vs TJUN Holdings

How EOCT and TJUN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of EOCT and 0.0% of TJUN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for TJUN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EOCT and TJUN, widest gap first
CountryMore in EOCTMore in TJUN
TaiwanSame weight
South KoreaSame weight
ChinaSame weight
IndiaSame weight
BrazilSame weight
South AfricaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
PolandSame weight
Other countries (10)Same weight

Outside the US: EOCT 1% developed, 99% emerging. TJUN 1% developed, 99% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EOCT108.4%
  • TJUN109.1%

Securities held

  • EOCT3
  • TJUN2

Asset class

EOCT
Equity
TJUN
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in EOCT3
  • In both0
  • Only in TJUN2

Only in EOCT

3 securities, 100% of EOCT by weight

  • Eem 09/30/2027 0.67 C94.68%
  • Eem 09/30/2027 66.79 P12.81%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.93%

Only in TJUN

2 securities, 100% of TJUN by weight

  • 2027-06-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF C 0.7191.62%
  • 2027-06-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF P 70.7916.22%

Weight gaps

EOCT and TJUN share no securities.

All 6 EOCT holdings⁠All 4 TJUN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EOCT vs TJUN Cost

Overpaying TJUN vs EOCT

$997

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EOCT 0.89%

    $16,872

  • TJUN 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EOCT 0.89%
  • TJUN 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TJUN $17,869EOCT $16,872

Year by year

YearEOCTTJUNOverpaying
10$1,576$1,678$102
20$5,953$6,322$369
30$16,872$17,869$997

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%EOCT, cheaper
  • 0.95%TJUN
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
  • Median 0.89%

EOCT 5th cheapest of 14 funds

TJUN 10th cheapest of 14 funds

EOCT vs TJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
EOCT None
TJUN None

Distribution history

EOCTAll EOCT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TJUNAll TJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

EOCT vs TJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EOCT 8.5%TJUN 10.0%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EOCT 1.18TJUN 0.02since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EOCT −20.1%TJUN −9.8%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EOCT 0.46TJUN 0.46Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • EOCTBvsEBUFB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TJUNDvsEBUFB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EOCTBvsEJANB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TJUNDvsEJANB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EOCTBvsEJULB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TJUNDvsEJULB

    FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.