EOCT ranks 1st and TJUN 13th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.
EOCT vs TJUN
0.0%by weight
EOCT −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
EOCT 2.6×the volume
14.6K5.54K
EOCT vs TJUN Performance
+7.7%−2.4%
- EOCT 0.89%, better
- TJUN 0.95%
- EOCT $125M
- TJUN $12M
- EOCT +7.7%, better
- TJUN −2.4%
- EOCT 3
- TJUN 3
- EOCT 14.6K sh, better
- TJUN 5.54K sh
- EOCT $33.43
- TJUN $21.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EOCT | TJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47Higher | F17 |
| Mission | A91 | |
| Risk | A73Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A80Higher | B60 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds
Same Category. EOCT and TJUN are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EOCTB
TJUND
In short
EOCT Buffer ETFs mostly babysit the S&P 500. EOCT aims the same machinery at emerging markets: upside in the iShares MSCI EM ETF up to a cap, with the first 15% of a drop absorbed, then a reset every October.
Stated mandate
EOCT The fund seeks capped exposure to the iShares MSCI EM ETF while protecting against the first 15% of losses during each approximately annual outcome period. It resets at the end of each period and may be held indefinitely.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EOCT vs TJUN Holdings
How EOCT and TJUN differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of EOCT and 0.0% of TJUN.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TJUN.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in EOCTMore in TJUN | EOCT | TJUN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | Same weight | 30.5% | 30.5% |
| South Korea | Same weight | 20.2% | 20.2% |
| China | Same weight | 19.9% | 19.9% |
| India | Same weight | 12.1% | 12.1% |
| Brazil | Same weight | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| South Africa | Same weight | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Poland | Same weight | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Other countries (10) | Same weight | 6.1% | 6.1% |
Outside the US: EOCT 1% developed, 99% emerging. TJUN 1% developed, 99% emerging.
Concentration
- EOCT108.4%
- TJUN109.1%
- EOCT3
- TJUN2
Asset class
- EOCT
- Equity
- TJUN
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in EOCT3
- In both0
- Only in TJUN2
Only in EOCT
3 securities, 100% of EOCT by weight
- Eem 09/30/2027 0.67 C94.68%
- Eem 09/30/2027 66.79 P12.81%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.93%
Only in TJUN
2 securities, 100% of TJUN by weight
- 2027-06-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF C 0.7191.62%
- 2027-06-17 iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF P 70.7916.22%
Weight gaps
EOCT and TJUN share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EOCT vs TJUN Cost
Overpaying TJUN vs EOCT
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EOCT 0.89%
$16,872
TJUN 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EOCT | TJUN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%EOCT, cheaper
- 0.95%TJUN
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
EOCT 5th cheapest of 14 funds
TJUN 10th cheapest of 14 funds
EOCT vs TJUN Dividends
- EOCT None
- TJUN None
Distribution history
EOCT vs TJUN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EOCT 8.5%TJUN 10.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EOCT 1.18TJUN 0.02
- Worst fall
- EOCT −20.1%TJUN −9.8%
- Market sensitivity
- EOCT 0.46TJUN 0.46Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.