FLMX ranks 2nd and EPHE 14th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EPHE vs FLMX
FLMX −0.40pt a year
0.59%0.19%
EPHE 10.6×the volume
148K14K
FLMX +18.0pt
−5.3%+12.7%
EPHE vs FLMX Performance
−24.0%+82.0%
- EPHE 0.59%
- FLMX 0.19%, better
- EPHE $144M
- FLMX $81M
- EPHE −1.4%
- FLMX +18.8%, better
- EPHE 2.97%
- FLMX 3.75%, better
- EPHE 37
- FLMX 38
- EPHE 148K sh, better
- FLMX 14K sh
- EPHE $22.89
- FLMX $37.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPHE | FLMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A100Higher |
| Mission | D31 | B66Higher |
| Risk | C50 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | C51Higher |
| Holdings | F16 | B62Higher |
| Durability | C51Higher | D37 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EPHE and FLMX are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPHEC
FLMXA
In short
EPHE A single-ticker route into the Philippine stock market: roughly 30 large, mid and small caps from an MSCI index, in an iShares wrapper that has traded since 2010. Narrow by design, so the country's biggest listed names set the tone.
FLMX Mexico exposure at a discount. Franklin's tracker charges 0.19%, a fraction of what single-country emerging-market funds usually cost, and holds a compact basket of the country's largest listed companies.
Stated mandate
EPHE The fund seeks to track an index composed of Philippine equities.
FLMX The Fund seeks to track the performance of the FTSE Mexico Capped Index before fees and expenses through an indexing strategy, investing at least 80% of assets in index components or related exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPHE vs FLMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPHE vs FLMX Cost
Overpaying EPHE vs FLMX
$7,683
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPHE 0.59%
$11,635
FLMX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPHE | FLMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $347 | $711 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $1,351 | $2,700 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $3,952 | $7,683 |
- 0.59%EPHE
- 0.19%FLMX, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
FLMX cheapest of 21 funds
EPHE 7th cheapest of 21 funds
EPHE vs FLMX Dividends
- EPHE 2.97%
- FLMX 3.75%, better
- EPHE $0.68
- FLMX $1.42
- EPHE $0.48
- FLMX $0.72
- EPHE Jun 15, 2026
- FLMX Jun 26, 2026
- EPHE Jun 18, 2026
- FLMX Jul 6, 2026
- EPHE Twice a year
- FLMX Twice a year
Distribution history
EPHE vs FLMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPHE
- FLMX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPHE 17.6%, betterFLMX 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EPHE −0.12FLMX 0.55, better
- Worst fall
- EPHE −32.9%FLMX −31.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EPHE 0.68FLMX 1.08
EPHE and FLMX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
