FLMX ranks 2nd and EPOL 3rd of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EPOL vs FLMX
FLMX −0.40pt a year
0.59%0.19%
EPOL 40.6×the volume
415K10.2K
EPOL +5.0pt
+17.5%+12.5%
EPOL vs FLMX Performance
+123.6%+80.3%
- EPOL 0.59%
- FLMX 0.19%, better
- EPOL $1.03B
- FLMX $82M
- EPOL +34.1%, better
- FLMX +16.3%
- EPOL 3.39%
- FLMX 3.91%, better
- EPOL 37
- FLMX 39
- EPOL 415K sh, better
- FLMX 10.2K sh
- EPOL $43.43
- FLMX $36.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPOL | FLMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A100Higher |
| Mission | B63 | B65Higher |
| Risk | A77Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | C54 | B64Higher |
| Durability | A79Higher | D37 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EPOL and FLMX are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPOLB
FLMXB
In short
EPOL Poland in one ticket. Running since 2010, EPOL holds roughly 30 Polish stocks under MSCI's 25/50 capping rules, and it sits in the upper tier of single-country emerging-market funds.
FLMX Mexico exposure at a discount. Franklin's tracker charges 0.19%, a fraction of what single-country emerging-market funds usually cost, and holds a compact basket of the country's largest listed companies.
Stated mandate
EPOL The fund seeks to track an index composed of Polish equities.
FLMX The Fund seeks to track the performance of the FTSE Mexico Capped Index before fees and expenses through an indexing strategy, investing at least 80% of assets in index components or related exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPOL vs FLMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPOL vs FLMX Cost
Overpaying EPOL vs FLMX
$7,683
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPOL 0.59%
$11,635
FLMX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPOL | FLMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $347 | $711 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $1,351 | $2,700 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $3,952 | $7,683 |
- 0.59%EPOL
- 0.19%FLMX, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
FLMX cheapest of 21 funds
EPOL 7th cheapest of 21 funds
EPOL vs FLMX Dividends
- EPOL 3.39%
- FLMX 3.91%, better
- EPOL $1.47
- FLMX $1.42
- EPOL $0.30
- FLMX $0.72
- EPOL Jun 15, 2026
- FLMX Jun 26, 2026
- EPOL Jun 18, 2026
- FLMX Jul 6, 2026
- EPOL Twice a year
- FLMX Twice a year
Distribution history
EPOL vs FLMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPOL
- FLMX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPOL 17.2%, betterFLMX 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EPOL 1.64, betterFLMX 0.55
- Worst fall
- EPOL −53.6%FLMX −31.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EPOL 0.70FLMX 1.08
EPOL and FLMX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
