EPS ranks 3rd and RWLC 19th of 29 funds in the US Large-Cap Category.
EPS vs RWLC
EPS −0.24pt a year
0.08%0.32%
EPS 7.0×the volume
51K7.31K
RWLC +2.8pt
+22.8%+25.6%
EPS vs RWLC Performance
+14.0%+16.0%
- EPS 0.08%, better
- RWLC 0.32%
- EPS $1.63B
- RWLC $101M
- EPS +14.0%
- RWLC +16.0%, better
- EPS 1.13%
- RWLC 12.79%, better
- EPS 506
- RWLC 107
- EPS 51K sh, better
- RWLC 7.31K sh
- EPS $78.98
- RWLC $38.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPS | RWLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | D36 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B63 |
| Risk | B63Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | B56Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A73Higher | C46 |
Rank among US Large-Cap funds
Same Category. EPS and RWLC are both graded against the same 29 US Large-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPSA
RWLCC
In short
EPS Large-cap core with a profit filter. Roughly 500 U.S. companies, all of them earnings generators, tracked since 2007 for 0.08% a year. Same plumbing as a plain index fund, with a screen most of them skip.
RWLC A boutique quant shop's swing at US large caps: RWLC follows the FT Wilshire US Large NxtGen Index, a published multifactor rulebook rather than a plain cap-weighted list, and charges the category's middle price to do it.
Stated mandate
EPS The fund seeks to track earnings-generating large-cap companies in the U.S. equity market.
RWLC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPS vs RWLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPS vs RWLC Cost
Overpaying RWLC vs EPS
$4,853
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPS 0.08%
$1,689
RWLC 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPS | RWLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $580 | $433 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,250 | $1,675 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $6,542 | $4,853 |
- 0.08%EPS, cheaper
- 0.32%RWLC
- Middle half of US Large-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
EPS 6th cheapest of 29 funds
RWLC 19th cheapest of 29 funds
EPS vs RWLC Dividends
- EPS 1.13%
- RWLC 12.79%, better
- EPS $0.90
- RWLC $4.88
- EPS $0.23
- RWLC $4.88
- EPS Sep 25, 2026
- RWLC Dec 30, 2025
- EPS Sep 29, 2026
- RWLC Jan 7, 2026
- EPS Quarterly
- RWLC Annual
Distribution history
EPS vs RWLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPS 11.8%RWLC 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EPS 1.43RWLC 1.73, better
- Worst fall
- EPS −23.6%RWLC −21.0%
- Market sensitivity
- EPS 0.96RWLC 0.85
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.