IQSZ ranks 2nd and ETEC 6th of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.
ETEC vs IQSZ
IQSZ −0.28pt a year
0.47%0.19%
IQSZ 2.5×the volume
6091.5K
ETEC vs IQSZ Performance
−14.8%+16.2%
- ETEC 0.47%
- IQSZ 0.19%, better
- ETEC $3M
- IQSZ $169M
- ETEC −14.8%
- IQSZ +16.2%, better
- ETEC 0.60%
- IQSZ 1.93%, better
- ETEC 59
- IQSZ 472
- ETEC 609 sh
- IQSZ 1.5K sh, better
- ETEC $21.69
- IQSZ $31.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ETEC | IQSZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A83Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F21 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | D35Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | D38 | A75Higher |
| Durability | C52 | B65Higher |
Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds
Same Category. ETEC and IQSZ are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ETECC
IQSZB
In short
ETEC iShares' bet on the next wave of green tech rather than today's incumbents: roughly 50 global names across eight environmental themes, from water to sustainable farming, priced under the typical global thematic fund.
IQSZ Active net-zero investing priced like an index fund: 0.19% for a global, roughly 500-stock portfolio where a quant process weighs momentum, quality and value alongside a company's emissions plans.
Stated mandate
ETEC Seeks to track an index of global companies developing breakthrough environmental technologies across energy efficiency, green buildings, green transportation, pollution prevention, renewable energy, water, resource efficiency, and sustainable agriculture.
IQSZ Seeks long-term total return. It actively invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of companies judged to support the transition to a net-zero economy through current or planned greenhouse-gas reductions, primarily among large- and mid-cap companies in developed and emerging markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ETEC vs IQSZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ETEC vs IQSZ Cost
Overpaying ETEC vs IQSZ
$5,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ETEC 0.47%
$9,418
IQSZ 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ETEC | IQSZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $347 | $500 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $1,351 | $1,910 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $3,952 | $5,466 |
- 0.47%ETEC
- 0.19%IQSZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
- Median 0.48%
IQSZ 2nd cheapest of 8 funds
ETEC 4th cheapest of 8 funds
ETEC vs IQSZ Dividends
- ETEC 0.60%
- IQSZ 1.93%, better
- ETEC $0.13
- IQSZ $0.60
- ETEC $0.10
- IQSZ $0.13
- ETEC Jun 15, 2026
- IQSZ Sep 21, 2026
- ETEC Jun 18, 2026
- IQSZ Sep 25, 2026
- ETEC Twice a year
- IQSZ Quarterly
Distribution history
ETEC vs IQSZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ETEC 24.2%IQSZ 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- ETEC 0.12IQSZ 1.41
- Worst fall
- ETEC −39.6%IQSZ −9.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ETEC 1.34IQSZ 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.