KLMT ranks 1st and ETEC 6th of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.
ETEC vs KLMT
KLMT −0.37pt a year
0.47%0.10%
KLMT 2.8×the volume
6091.72K
ETEC vs KLMT Performance
−14.8%+12.4%
- ETEC 0.47%
- KLMT 0.10%, better
- ETEC $3M
- KLMT $1.55B
- ETEC −14.8%
- KLMT +12.4%, better
- ETEC 0.60%
- KLMT 1.82%, better
- ETEC 59
- KLMT 503
- ETEC 609 sh
- KLMT 1.72K sh, better
- ETEC $21.69
- KLMT $34.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ETEC | KLMT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F21 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | D35 | D35 |
| Holdings | D38 | A72Higher |
| Durability | C52 | A70Higher |
Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds
Same Category. ETEC and KLMT are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ETECC
KLMTA
In short
ETEC iShares' bet on the next wave of green tech rather than today's incumbents: roughly 50 global names across eight environmental themes, from water to sustainable farming, priced under the typical global thematic fund.
KLMT A climate fund that behaves like a core global index fund: roughly 500 developed and emerging market stocks, full replication, and a 0.10% fee that undercuts most of the thematic aisle.
Stated mandate
ETEC Seeks to track an index of global companies developing breakthrough environmental technologies across energy efficiency, green buildings, green transportation, pollution prevention, renewable energy, water, resource efficiency, and sustainable agriculture.
KLMT The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index before fees and expenses, using full replication of the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ETEC vs KLMT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ETEC vs KLMT Cost
Overpaying ETEC vs KLMT
$7,312
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ETEC 0.47%
$9,418
KLMT 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ETEC | KLMT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $183 | $664 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $717 | $2,544 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $2,106 | $7,312 |
- 0.47%ETEC
- 0.10%KLMT, cheaper
- Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
- Median 0.48%
KLMT cheapest of 8 funds
ETEC 4th cheapest of 8 funds
ETEC vs KLMT Dividends
- ETEC 0.60%
- KLMT 1.82%, better
- ETEC $0.13
- KLMT $0.62
- ETEC $0.10
- KLMT $0.14
- ETEC Jun 15, 2026
- KLMT Sep 21, 2026
- ETEC Jun 18, 2026
- KLMT Sep 25, 2026
- ETEC Twice a year
- KLMT Quarterly
Distribution history
ETEC vs KLMT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ETEC 24.2%KLMT 10.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- ETEC 0.12KLMT 1.08
- Worst fall
- ETEC −39.6%KLMT −16.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ETEC 1.34KLMT 0.89
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.