CCSO ranks 3rd and ETEC 6th of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.
CCSO vs ETEC
CCSO −0.12pt a year
0.35%0.47%
CCSO 4.1×the volume
2.5K609
CCSO +10.1pt
+14.6%+4.5%
CCSO vs ETEC Performance
−5.7%−14.8%
- CCSO 0.35%, better
- ETEC 0.47%
- CCSO $45M
- ETEC $3M
- CCSO −5.7%, better
- ETEC −14.8%
- CCSO 0.64%, better
- ETEC 0.60%
- CCSO 124
- ETEC 59
- CCSO 2.5K sh, better
- ETEC 609 sh
- CCSO $24.79
- ETEC $21.69
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCSO | ETEC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71Higher | B59 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | D35 | D38Higher |
| Durability | C49 | C52Higher |
Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds
Same Category. CCSO and ETEC are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCSOB
ETECC
In short
CCSO The name is the mandate: US-listed companies working on climate-change solutions, in a plain 1940 Act wrapper priced well under the typical US thematic fund.
ETEC iShares' bet on the next wave of green tech rather than today's incumbents: roughly 50 global names across eight environmental themes, from water to sustainable farming, priced under the typical global thematic fund.
Stated mandate
CCSO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through investments primarily in U.S.-listed equity securities of companies focused on climate-change solutions.
ETEC Seeks to track an index of global companies developing breakthrough environmental technologies across energy efficiency, green buildings, green transportation, pollution prevention, renewable energy, water, resource efficiency, and sustainable agriculture.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCSO vs ETEC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCSO vs ETEC Cost
Overpaying ETEC vs CCSO
$2,292
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCSO 0.35%
$7,126
ETEC 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCSO | ETEC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $847 | $213 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $3,261 | $807 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $9,418 | $2,292 |
- 0.35%CCSO, cheaper
- 0.47%ETEC
- Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
- Median 0.48%
CCSO 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
ETEC 4th cheapest of 8 funds
CCSO vs ETEC Dividends
- CCSO 0.64%, better
- ETEC 0.60%
- CCSO $0.16
- ETEC $0.13
- CCSO $0.16
- ETEC $0.10
- CCSO Dec 29, 2025
- ETEC Jun 15, 2026
- CCSO Dec 30, 2025
- ETEC Jun 18, 2026
- CCSO Annual
- ETEC Twice a year
Distribution history
CCSO vs ETEC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCSO 20.1%, betterETEC 24.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CCSO 0.56, betterETEC 0.12
- Worst fall
- CCSO −23.7%ETEC −39.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CCSO 1.30ETEC 1.34
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.