XLF ranks 1st and EUFN 13th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.
EUFN vs XLF
XLF −0.41pt a year
0.49%0.08%
XLF 20.1×the volume
1.64M33M
XLF +0.8pt
+12.4%+13.2%
EUFN vs XLF Performance
+127.9%+52.9%
- EUFN 0.49%
- XLF 0.08%, better
- EUFN $2.92B
- XLF $53.1B
- EUFN +16.3%, better
- XLF +9.6%
- EUFN 4.38%, better
- XLF 1.46%
- EUFN 93
- XLF 79
- EUFN 1.64M sh
- XLF 33M sh, better
- EUFN $37.66
- XLF $56.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EUFN | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B58Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | C54 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | B67Higher | C42 |
| Durability | A76 | A81Higher |
Rank among Financials (Broad) funds
Same Category. EUFN and XLF are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EUFNC
XLFA
In short
EUFN European banks, insurers and asset managers in one US-listed ticket. Roughly 80 stocks spanning 15 developed European markets, from Spanish lenders to Swiss and British giants, and it has been doing that one job since 2010.
XLF The 1998 original. XLF holds the S&P 500's financial sector, roughly 80 banks, insurers, card networks and exchanges, for 0.08% a year. Not the whole sector, the blue-chip end of it, and one of the most heavily traded ways to own it.
Stated mandate
EUFN The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market European equities in the financials sector, providing regional sector exposure to European banks, insurers, and financial-services firms.
XLF The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Financial Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EUFN vs XLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EUFN vs XLF Cost
Overpaying EUFN vs XLF
$8,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EUFN 0.49%
$9,792
XLF 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EUFN | XLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $147 | $736 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $575 | $2,819 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $1,689 | $8,103 |
- 0.49%EUFN
- 0.08%XLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLF cheapest of 18 funds
EUFN 14th cheapest of 18 funds
EUFN vs XLF Dividends
- EUFN 4.38%, better
- XLF 1.46%
- EUFN $1.65
- XLF $0.83
- EUFN $1.14
- XLF $0.20
- EUFN Jun 15, 2026
- XLF Sep 21, 2026
- EUFN Jun 18, 2026
- XLF Sep 23, 2026
- EUFN Twice a year
- XLF Quarterly
Distribution history
EUFN vs XLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EUFN
- XLF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EUFN 15.8%XLF 15.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EUFN 1.65, betterXLF 1.13
- Worst fall
- EUFN −35.1%XLF −25.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EUFN 0.79XLF 0.75
EUFN and XLF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





