USG ranks 5th and EVMT 9th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
EVMT vs USG
USG −0.14pt a year
0.59%0.45%
USG 1.3×the volume
3.34K4.23K
USG +16.3pt
+3.6%+19.9%
EVMT vs USG Performance
+6.6%−5.1%
- EVMT 0.59%
- USG 0.45%, better
- EVMT $4M
- USG $9M
- EVMT +6.6%, better
- USG −5.1%
- EVMT 12.06%
- USG 31.56%, better
- EVMT 3
- USG 3
- EVMT 3.34K sh
- USG 4.23K sh, better
- EVMT $16.40
- USG $30.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EVMT | USG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87 | A99Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C48Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | D28Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C47Higher | D39 |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. EVMT and USG are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EVMTC
USGB
In short
EVMT Most EV-metals funds buy the miners. EVMT buys the metals: an actively managed basket of futures on copper, nickel, aluminum, cobalt, iron ore and lithium, with 1099 tax reporting instead of a K-1.
USG Gold with a paycheck attached. USG holds claims on real gold bars plus collateralized futures, sells call options against that gold, and distributes quarterly, at one of the lowest fees in the commodity-futures crowd.
Stated mandate
EVMT The Fund seeks to outperform the excess-return version of its Benchmark, identified as SPGEVMUP.
USG The Fund seeks long-term results that generally correspond to gold-price performance while generating dividend income from selling gold call options and collateral interest. It obtains gold exposure through gold warrants, collateralized futures, and related derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EVMT vs USG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EVMT vs USG Cost
Overpaying EVMT vs USG
$2,594
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EVMT 0.59%
$11,635
USG 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EVMT | USG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $812 | $246 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $3,128 | $923 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $9,041 | $2,594 |
- 0.59%EVMT
- 0.45%USG, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
USG cheapest of 13 funds
EVMT 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
EVMT vs USG Dividends
- EVMT 12.06%
- USG 31.56%, better
- EVMT $2.00
- USG $9.52
- EVMT $2.00
- USG $0.17
- EVMT Dec 22, 2025
- USG Sep 21, 2026
- EVMT Dec 26, 2025
- USG Sep 23, 2026
- EVMT Annual
- USG Quarterly
Distribution history
EVMT vs USG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EVMT 16.0%, betterUSG 17.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- EVMT −0.03USG 0.87, better
- Worst fall
- EVMT −48.3%USG −28.8%
- Market sensitivity
- EVMT 0.69USG 0.28
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.