EWC ranks 1st and EWS 17th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWC vs EWS
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.50%0.50%
EWC 1.3×the volume
1.68M1.27M
EWC +3.0pt
+11.5%+8.5%
EWC vs EWS Performance
+71.2%+59.7%
- EWC 0.50%
- EWS 0.50%
- EWC $7.58B
- EWS $1.08B
- EWC +21.5%, better
- EWS +11.0%
- EWC 1.23%
- EWS 3.91%, better
- EWC 83
- EWS 20
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- EWS 1.27M sh
- EWC $60.62
- EWS $30.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWC | EWS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | B55 |
| Mission | A90Higher | B58 |
| Risk | A88Higher | B68 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | A78 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | F22 |
| Durability | A80Higher | A76 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWC and EWS are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWCA
EWSB
In short
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
EWS One of the 1996 originals, still doing the same job: Singapore's large and mid caps in one ticker. Index rules cap any single issuer at 25%, which matters in a market this top-heavy.
Stated mandate
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
EWS The fund seeks to track an index composed of Singaporean equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Singapore.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWC vs EWS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWC vs EWS Cost
Same expense ratio
$9,979
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
EWS 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWC | EWS |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $900 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,460 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,979 |
- 0.50%EWC
- 0.50%EWS
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWS 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC vs EWS Dividends
- EWC 1.23%
- EWS 3.91%, better
- EWC $0.75
- EWS $1.18
- EWC $0.28
- EWS $0.52
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- EWS Jun 15, 2026
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- EWS Jun 18, 2026
- EWC Twice a year
- EWS Twice a year
Distribution history
EWC vs EWS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWC
- EWS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWC 13.1%EWS 12.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWC 1.54EWS 1.60, better
- Worst fall
- EWC −24.8%, betterEWS −29.0%
- Market sensitivity
- EWC 0.88EWS 0.55
EWC and EWS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





