FLGB ranks 3rd and EWS 17th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWS vs FLGB
FLGB −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWS 11.9×the volume
1.27M106K
FLGB +2.1pt
+9.8%+11.9%
EWS vs FLGB Performance
+59.7%+75.3%
- EWS 0.50%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- EWS $1.08B
- FLGB $878M
- EWS +11.0%
- FLGB +16.3%, better
- EWS 3.91%, better
- FLGB 2.86%
- EWS 20
- FLGB 89
- EWS 1.27M sh, better
- FLGB 106K sh
- EWS $30.58
- FLGB $36.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWS | FLGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | B58 | A73Higher |
| Risk | B68 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | A78Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | F22 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWS and FLGB are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWSB
FLGBA
In short
EWS One of the 1996 originals, still doing the same job: Singapore's large and mid caps in one ticker. Index rules cap any single issuer at 25%, which matters in a market this top-heavy.
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
Stated mandate
EWS The fund seeks to track an index composed of Singaporean equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Singapore.
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWS vs FLGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWS vs FLGB Cost
Overpaying EWS vs FLGB
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWS 0.50%
$9,979
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWS | FLGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWS
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
EWS 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWS vs FLGB Dividends
- EWS 3.91%, better
- FLGB 2.86%
- EWS $1.18
- FLGB $1.06
- EWS $0.52
- FLGB $0.47
- EWS Jun 15, 2026
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- EWS Jun 18, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- EWS Twice a year
- FLGB Twice a year
Distribution history
EWS vs FLGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWS
- FLGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWS 12.3%FLGB 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWS 1.60, betterFLGB 1.44
- Worst fall
- EWS −29.0%FLGB −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWS 0.55FLGB 0.75
EWS and FLGB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


