EWC ranks 1st and FLTW 13th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWC vs FLTW
0.0%by weight
FLTW −0.31pt a year
0.50%0.19%
EWC 3.2×the volume
1.68M524K
FLTW +8.7pt
+11.3%+20.0%
EWC vs FLTW Performance
+71.2%+149.2%
- EWC 0.50%
- FLTW 0.19%, better
- EWC $7.58B
- FLTW $4.64B
- EWC +21.5%
- FLTW +58.8%, better
- EWC 1.23%
- FLTW 1.70%, better
- EWC 83
- FLTW 139
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- FLTW 524K sh
- EWC $60.62
- FLTW $98.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWC | FLTW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A90Higher | B59 |
| Risk | A88Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B60 |
| Durability | A80Higher | B55 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWC and FLTW are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWCA
FLTWB
In short
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
FLTW Taiwan in one ticker, priced like a core index fund. FLTW passively tracks a capped FTSE index of roughly 60 Taiwanese stocks for 0.19% a year, well under half the typical fee among index-tracking ETFs.
Stated mandate
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
FLTW The Fund seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, closely track the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWC vs FLTW Holdings
How EWC and FLTW differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of EWC and 0.0% of FLTW.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Country1.1%
- Sector32.6%
Sector
| Sector | More in EWCMore in FLTW | EWC | FLTW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | FLTW +66.2 points | 9.6% | 75.8% |
| Financials | EWC +27.3 points | 40.4% | 13.1% |
| Energy | EWC +17.5 points | 17.7% | 0.1% |
| Materials | EWC +10.5 points | 13.9% | 3.4% |
| Industrials | EWC +5.7 points | 8.9% | 3.2% |
| Consumer Staples | EWC +2.5 points | 3.2% | 0.7% |
| Utilities | EWC +2.5 points | 2.5% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | EWC +1.2 points | 3.0% | 1.8% |
| Health Care | FLTW +0.6 points | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| Communication | FLTW +0.5 points | 0.7% | 1.2% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in EWCMore in FLTW | EWC | FLTW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | EWC +98.9 points | 98.9% | 0.0% |
| Taiwan | FLTW +98.6 points | 0.0% | 98.5% |
| United States | FLTW +0.4 points | 1.1% | 1.4% |
Outside the US: FLTW 0% developed, 100% emerging.
Concentration
- EWC45.9%
- FLTW50.0%
- EWC80
- FLTW137
Asset class
- EWC
- Equity
- FLTW
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in EWC80
- In both0
- Only in FLTW137
Only in EWC
80 securities, 99.7% of EWC by weight
- Royal Bank of Canada9.11%
- Toronto Dominion6.65%
- Shopify Subordinate Voting Class A6.18%
- Bank of Montreal3.78%
- Canadian Natural Resources Ltd3.77%
- Bank of Nova Scotia3.71%
- Enbridge3.49%
- Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce3.44%
- Suncor Energy Inc3.04%
- Agnico Eagle Mines2.71%
- Canadian Pacific Kansas City2.57%
- Brookfield Class A2.51%
- Manulife Financial2.40%
- Tc Energy2.17%
- Canadian National Railway2.07%
- Barrick Mining1.99%
- National Bank of Canada1.88%
- Wheaton Precious Metals1.71%
- Constellation Software1.58%
- Sun Life Financial Inc1.46%
- Franco Nevada1.40%
- Cenovus Energy1.39%
- Dollarama1.30%
- Alimentation Couche Tard Inc1.29%
- Power Corporation of Canada1.19%
- Fairfax Financial Holdings Sub Vot1.09%
- Cameco1.08%
- Nutrien Ltd1.08%
- Intact Financial Corp1.07%
- Celestica1.04%
- Fortis0.97%
- Pembina Pipeline0.96%
- Teck Resources Subordinate Voting0.90%
- Loblaw Companies Ltd0.88%
- Kinross Gold0.77%
- Restaurants Brands International0.76%
- Imperial Oil Ltd0.65%
- Bombardier Class B0.63%
- Tourmaline Oil Corp0.59%
- Wsp Global Inc0.58%
- Whitecap Resources Inc0.55%
- Rb Global0.54%
- Great West Lifeco Inc0.53%
- Magna International0.52%
- First Quantum Minerals0.52%
- Brookfield Asset Management Voting0.51%
- Pan American Silver0.51%
- Thomson Reuters Corp0.50%
- Emera Inc0.49%
- Cgi Inc Class A0.48%
Only in FLTW
137 securities, 100% of FLTW by weight
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manu20.31%
- Mediatek Inc8.41%
- Hon Hai Precision Industr4.37%
- Delta Electronics Inc3.76%
- Ase Technology Holding Co3.23%
- Nan Ya Plastics Corp2.13%
- Elite Material Co Ltd1.98%
- Fubon Financial Holding C1.97%
- Ctbc Financial Holding Co1.95%
- Unimicron Technology Corp1.90%
- United Microelectronics C1.90%
- Cathay Financial Holding1.61%
- Asia Vital Components1.45%
- Ts Financial Holding Co L1.44%
- Quanta Computer Inc1.23%
- Yuanta Financial Holding1.22%
- Accton Technology Corp1.17%
- Yageo Corporation1.15%
- E.sun Financial Holding C1.14%
- Chroma Ate Inc0.94%
- Mega Financial Holding Co0.94%
- Global Unichip Corp0.90%
- Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd0.89%
- Asustek Computer Inc0.89%
- Sinopac Financial Holding0.89%
- Kgi Financial Holding Co0.87%
- Nanya Technology Corp0.86%
- Wiwynn Corp0.82%
- Wistron Corp0.81%
- Jentech Precision Industr0.80%
- Aspeed Technology Inc0.78%
- King Slide Works Co Ltd0.78%
- Largan Precision Co Ltd0.74%
- Winbond Electronics Corp0.74%
- First Financial Holding C0.73%
- Lite-On Technology Corp0.69%
- Hua Nan Financial Holding0.68%
- Mpi Corp0.59%
- Uni-President Enterprises0.58%
- Realtek Semiconductor Cor0.57%
- Zhen Ding Technology Hold0.56%
- Pharmaessentia Corp0.55%
- Gold Circuit Electronics0.52%
- Phison Electronics Corp0.52%
- Novatek Microelectronics0.48%
- Taiwan Union Technology C0.46%
- Advantech Co Ltd0.46%
- Innolux Corp0.45%
- Kinsus Interconnect Tech0.45%
- Taiwan Cooperative Financ0.45%
Weight gaps
EWC and FLTW share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWC vs FLTW Cost
Overpaying EWC vs FLTW
$6,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
FLTW 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWC | FLTW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $347 | $553 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $1,351 | $2,109 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $3,952 | $6,027 |
- 0.50%EWC
- 0.19%FLTW, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLTW 7th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC vs FLTW Dividends
- EWC 1.23%
- FLTW 1.70%, better
- EWC $0.75
- FLTW $1.64
- EWC $0.28
- FLTW $0.18
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- FLTW Jun 26, 2026
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- FLTW Jul 6, 2026
- EWC Twice a year
- FLTW Twice a year
Distribution history
EWC vs FLTW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWC
- FLTW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWC 13.1%, betterFLTW 26.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWC 1.54, betterFLTW 1.33
- Worst fall
- EWC −24.8%, betterFLTW −38.0%
- Market sensitivity
- EWC 0.88FLTW 1.48
EWC and FLTW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





