FLGB ranks 3rd and FLTW 13th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
FLGB vs FLTW
FLGB −0.10pt a year
0.09%0.19%
FLTW 4.9×the volume
106K524K
FLTW +8.1pt
+11.9%+20.0%
FLGB vs FLTW Performance
+75.3%+149.2%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- FLTW 0.19%
- FLGB $878M
- FLTW $4.64B
- FLGB +16.3%
- FLTW +58.8%, better
- FLGB 2.86%, better
- FLTW 1.70%
- FLGB 89
- FLTW 139
- FLGB 106K sh
- FLTW 524K sh, better
- FLGB $36.82
- FLTW $98.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLGB | FLTW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | A82 |
| Mission | A73Higher | B59 |
| Risk | A73Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | B60 |
| Durability | C53 | B55Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. FLGB and FLTW are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLGBA
FLTWB
In short
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
FLTW Taiwan in one ticker, priced like a core index fund. FLTW passively tracks a capped FTSE index of roughly 60 Taiwanese stocks for 0.19% a year, well under half the typical fee among index-tracking ETFs.
Stated mandate
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
FLTW The Fund seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, closely track the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLGB vs FLTW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLGB vs FLTW Cost
Overpaying FLTW vs FLGB
$2,054
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
FLTW 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLGB | FLTW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $347 | $182 |
| 20 | $646 | $1,351 | $705 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $3,952 | $2,054 |
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- 0.19%FLTW
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
FLTW 7th cheapest of 38 funds
FLGB vs FLTW Dividends
- FLGB 2.86%, better
- FLTW 1.70%
- FLGB $1.06
- FLTW $1.64
- FLGB $0.47
- FLTW $0.18
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- FLTW Jun 26, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- FLTW Jul 6, 2026
- FLGB Twice a year
- FLTW Twice a year
Distribution history
FLGB vs FLTW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLGB
- FLTW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLGB 11.0%, betterFLTW 26.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLGB 1.44, betterFLTW 1.33
- Worst fall
- FLGB −25.9%, betterFLTW −38.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FLGB 0.75FLTW 1.48
FLGB and FLTW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



