FLCA ranks 1st and EWH 19th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWH vs FLCA
FLCA −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWH 59.0×the volume
2.9M49K
FLCA +9.6pt
+2.1%+11.7%
EWH vs FLCA Performance
+11.2%+73.7%
- EWH 0.50%
- FLCA 0.09%, better
- EWH $1.24B
- FLCA $857M
- EWH +9.7%
- FLCA +21.5%, better
- EWH 4.60%, better
- FLCA 1.70%
- EWH 30
- FLCA 92
- EWH 2.9M sh, better
- FLCA 49K sh
- EWH $22.34
- FLCA $54.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWH | FLCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | C48 | B65Higher |
| Risk | D36 | A87Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | D32 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWH and FLCA are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWHC
FLCAA
In short
EWH Hong Kong in a single US ticker, listed back in 1996. Roughly two dozen large Hong Kong companies tracking MSCI's Hong Kong 25-50 index, from the first generation of single-country funds.
FLCA Canada in one ticker, at index-fund pricing. FLCA tracks the FTSE Canada Capped Index, about 50 large- and mid-cap Canadian names, for 0.09% a year.
Stated mandate
EWH The fund seeks to track an index of Hong Kong equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Hong Kong.
FLCA The fund seeks to track the FTSE Canada Capped Index, which measures the performance of Canadian large- and mid-capitalization stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWH vs FLCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWH vs FLCA Cost
Overpaying EWH vs FLCA
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWH 0.50%
$9,979
FLCA 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWH | FLCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWH
- 0.09%FLCA, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLCA cheapest of 38 funds
EWH 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWH vs FLCA Dividends
- EWH 4.60%, better
- FLCA 1.70%
- EWH $1.04
- FLCA $0.92
- EWH $0.35
- FLCA $0.39
- EWH Jun 15, 2026
- FLCA Jun 26, 2026
- EWH Jun 18, 2026
- FLCA Jul 6, 2026
- EWH Twice a year
- FLCA Twice a year
Distribution history
EWH vs FLCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWH
- FLCA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWH 18.6%FLCA 13.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWH 0.62FLCA 1.54, better
- Worst fall
- EWH −36.3%FLCA −24.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWH 0.71FLCA 0.81
EWH and FLCA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

