FLGB ranks 3rd and EWH 19th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWH vs FLGB
FLGB −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWH 27.3×the volume
2.9M106K
FLGB +9.6pt
+2.1%+11.7%
EWH vs FLGB Performance
+11.2%+74.3%
- EWH 0.50%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- EWH $1.24B
- FLGB $878M
- EWH +9.7%
- FLGB +15.9%, better
- EWH 4.60%, better
- FLGB 2.87%
- EWH 30
- FLGB 89
- EWH 2.9M sh, better
- FLGB 106K sh
- EWH $22.34
- FLGB $36.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWH | FLGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | C48 | A73Higher |
| Risk | D36 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | D32 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWH and FLGB are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWHC
FLGBA
In short
EWH Hong Kong in a single US ticker, listed back in 1996. Roughly two dozen large Hong Kong companies tracking MSCI's Hong Kong 25-50 index, from the first generation of single-country funds.
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
Stated mandate
EWH The fund seeks to track an index of Hong Kong equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Hong Kong.
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWH vs FLGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWH vs FLGB Cost
Overpaying EWH vs FLGB
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWH 0.50%
$9,979
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWH | FLGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWH
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
EWH 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWH vs FLGB Dividends
- EWH 4.60%, better
- FLGB 2.87%
- EWH $1.04
- FLGB $1.06
- EWH $0.35
- FLGB $0.47
- EWH Jun 15, 2026
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- EWH Jun 18, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- EWH Twice a year
- FLGB Twice a year
Distribution history
EWH vs FLGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWH
- FLGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWH 18.6%FLGB 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWH 0.62FLGB 1.44, better
- Worst fall
- EWH −36.3%FLGB −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWH 0.71FLGB 0.75
EWH and FLGB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


