BBCA ranks 4th and EWH 19th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
BBCA vs EWH
BBCA −0.31pt a year
0.19%0.50%
EWH 8.8×the volume
330K2.9M
BBCA +9.4pt
+11.5%+2.1%
BBCA vs EWH Performance
+72.5%+11.2%
- BBCA 0.19%, better
- EWH 0.50%
- BBCA $11.9B
- EWH $1.24B
- BBCA +22.1%, better
- EWH +9.7%
- BBCA 1.68%
- EWH 4.60%, better
- BBCA 78
- EWH 30
- BBCA 330K sh
- EWH 2.9M sh, better
- BBCA $104.51
- EWH $22.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBCA | EWH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B55 |
| Mission | B59Higher | C48 |
| Risk | A87Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | B55 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | D32 |
| Durability | B58 | A71Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. BBCA and EWH are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBCAA
EWHC
In short
BBCA Canada, at a discount. BBCA tracks a Morningstar index of roughly 80 Canadian stocks for 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country funds charge, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund since its 2018 launch.
EWH Hong Kong in a single US ticker, listed back in 1996. Roughly two dozen large Hong Kong companies tracking MSCI's Hong Kong 25-50 index, from the first generation of single-country funds.
Stated mandate
BBCA The fund seeks to track the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive indexing approach to approximate the index rather than outperform it.
EWH The fund seeks to track an index of Hong Kong equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Hong Kong.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBCA vs EWH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBCA vs EWH Cost
Overpaying EWH vs BBCA
$6,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBCA 0.19%
$3,952
EWH 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBCA | EWH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $900 | $553 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $3,460 | $2,109 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $9,979 | $6,027 |
- 0.19%BBCA, cheaper
- 0.50%EWH
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
BBCA 7th cheapest of 38 funds
EWH 14th cheapest of 38 funds
BBCA vs EWH Dividends
- BBCA 1.68%
- EWH 4.60%, better
- BBCA $1.75
- EWH $1.04
- BBCA $0.42
- EWH $0.35
- BBCA Sep 22, 2026
- EWH Jun 15, 2026
- BBCA Sep 24, 2026
- EWH Jun 18, 2026
- BBCA Quarterly
- EWH Twice a year
Distribution history
BBCA vs EWH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBCA
- EWH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBCA 12.9%, betterEWH 18.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBCA 1.55, betterEWH 0.62
- Worst fall
- BBCA −24.4%, betterEWH −36.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BBCA 0.88EWH 0.71
BBCA and EWH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

