EWM ranks 4th and KPHO 21st of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EWM vs KPHO
EWM −0.52pt a year
0.50%1.02%
EWM 359.2×the volume
214K596
EWM vs KPHO Performance
+0.2%−11.8%
- EWM 0.50%, better
- KPHO 1.02%
- EWM $230M
- KPHO $11M
- EWM +7.8%
- KPHO
- EWM 3.71%
- KPHO
- EWM 25
- KPHO 39
- EWM 214K sh, better
- KPHO 596 sh
- EWM $26.87
- KPHO $22.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWM | KPHO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F0 |
| Mission | C43 | C43 |
| Risk | A78Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | F0 |
| Holdings | C41 | C47Higher |
| Durability | B56Higher | F21 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EWM and KPHO are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWMB
KPHOF
In short
EWM Malaysia in one ticker, running since 1996. EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia index, a cap-weighted slice of Kuala Lumpur's largest listed companies, and charges less than the typical single-country emerging markets fund.
KPHO Vietnam, run by people who live there. KraneShares hands the stock selection to Dragon Capital, a Vietnam-based manager with three decades on the ground, and wraps it in a published growth index and a US-listed ETF.
Stated mandate
EWM The fund seeks to track an index composed of Malaysian equities.
KPHO The Fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of its specified equity securities index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWM vs KPHO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWM vs KPHO Cost
Overpaying KPHO vs EWM
$9,033
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWM 0.50%
$9,979
KPHO 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWM | KPHO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,797 | $897 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,746 | $3,286 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $19,012 | $9,033 |
- 0.50%EWM, cheaper
- 1.02%KPHO
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWM 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
KPHO 21st cheapest of 21 funds
EWM vs KPHO Dividends
- EWM 3.71%
- KPHO
- EWM $1.00
- KPHO
- EWM $0.57
- KPHO $0.03
- EWM Jun 15, 2026
- KPHO Dec 30, 2025
- EWM Jun 18, 2026
- KPHO Dec 31, 2025
- EWM Twice a year
- KPHO Irregular
Distribution history
EWM vs KPHO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWM 13.0%KPHO
- Return per unit of risk
- EWM 0.68KPHO
- Worst fall
- EWM −22.2%KPHO
- Market sensitivity
- EWM 0.46KPHO 0.50
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.