EWW ranks 1st and KPHO 21st of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EWW vs KPHO
EWW −0.52pt a year
0.50%1.02%
EWW 1950.9×the volume
1.16M596
EWW vs KPHO Performance
+9.0%−11.8%
- EWW 0.50%, better
- KPHO 1.02%
- EWW $1.56B
- KPHO $11M
- EWW +15.8%
- KPHO
- EWW 3.31%
- KPHO
- EWW 42
- KPHO 39
- EWW 1.16M sh, better
- KPHO 596 sh
- EWW $74.42
- KPHO $22.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWW | KPHO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F0 |
| Mission | B67Higher | C43 |
| Risk | B55Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | F0 |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C47 |
| Durability | A81Higher | F21 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EWW and KPHO are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWWA
KPHOF
In short
EWW Mexico in one ticker, doing that job since 1996. Roughly 40 of the country's biggest listed names, capped so no single company runs the show, for 0.50% a year.
KPHO Vietnam, run by people who live there. KraneShares hands the stock selection to Dragon Capital, a Vietnam-based manager with three decades on the ground, and wraps it in a published growth index and a US-listed ETF.
Stated mandate
EWW The fund seeks to track an index composed of Mexican equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Mexico.
KPHO The Fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of its specified equity securities index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWW vs KPHO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWW vs KPHO Cost
Overpaying KPHO vs EWW
$9,033
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWW 0.50%
$9,979
KPHO 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWW | KPHO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,797 | $897 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,746 | $3,286 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $19,012 | $9,033 |
- 0.50%EWW, cheaper
- 1.02%KPHO
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWW 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
KPHO 21st cheapest of 21 funds
EWW vs KPHO Dividends
- EWW 3.31%
- KPHO
- EWW $2.46
- KPHO
- EWW $1.14
- KPHO $0.03
- EWW Jun 15, 2026
- KPHO Dec 30, 2025
- EWW Jun 18, 2026
- KPHO Dec 31, 2025
- EWW Twice a year
- KPHO Irregular
Distribution history
EWW vs KPHO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWW 20.1%KPHO
- Return per unit of risk
- EWW 0.56KPHO
- Worst fall
- EWW −31.2%KPHO
- Market sensitivity
- EWW 1.06KPHO 0.50
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.