FLGB ranks 3rd and EWQ 16th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWQ vs FLGB
FLGB −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWQ 3.3×the volume
349K106K
FLGB +6.9pt
+5.0%+11.9%
EWQ vs FLGB Performance
+27.4%+75.3%
- EWQ 0.50%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- EWQ $346M
- FLGB $878M
- EWQ −0.7%
- FLGB +16.3%, better
- EWQ 3.08%, better
- FLGB 2.86%
- EWQ 58
- FLGB 89
- EWQ 349K sh, better
- FLGB 106K sh
- EWQ $42.18
- FLGB $36.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWQ | FLGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A82Higher | A73 |
| Risk | C42 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | B58 | A72Higher |
| Durability | B61Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWQ and FLGB are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWQB
FLGBA
In short
EWQ One of the original country ETFs, running since 1996: about 60 French large and mid caps in one ticker. Fee sits right at the typical developed-market country fund, with a nearly three-decade record behind it.
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
Stated mandate
EWQ The fund seeks to track an index composed of French equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in France.
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWQ vs FLGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWQ vs FLGB Cost
Overpaying EWQ vs FLGB
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWQ 0.50%
$9,979
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWQ | FLGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWQ
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
EWQ 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWQ vs FLGB Dividends
- EWQ 3.08%, better
- FLGB 2.86%
- EWQ $1.32
- FLGB $1.06
- EWQ $1.09
- FLGB $0.47
- EWQ Jun 15, 2026
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- EWQ Jun 18, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- EWQ Twice a year
- FLGB Twice a year
Distribution history
EWQ vs FLGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWQ
- FLGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWQ 14.1%FLGB 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWQ 0.45FLGB 1.44, better
- Worst fall
- EWQ −31.4%FLGB −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWQ 0.85FLGB 0.75
EWQ and FLGB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




