FLKR ranks 15th and EWS 17th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWS vs FLKR
FLKR −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWS 1.5×the volume
1.27M830K
FLKR +5.8pt
+9.8%+15.6%
EWS vs FLKR Performance
+59.7%+106.4%
- EWS 0.50%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- EWS $1.08B
- FLKR $1.79B
- EWS +11.0%
- FLKR +61.1%, better
- EWS 3.91%, better
- FLKR 2.94%
- EWS 20
- FLKR 148
- EWS 1.27M sh, better
- FLKR 830K sh
- EWS $30.58
- FLKR $51.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWS | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | B58Higher | B57 |
| Risk | B68Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | F22 | C49Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | B60 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWS and FLKR are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWSB
FLKRB
In short
EWS One of the 1996 originals, still doing the same job: Singapore's large and mid caps in one ticker. Index rules cap any single issuer at 25%, which matters in a market this top-heavy.
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
Stated mandate
EWS The fund seeks to track an index composed of Singaporean equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Singapore.
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWS vs FLKR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWS vs FLKR Cost
Overpaying EWS vs FLKR
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWS 0.50%
$9,979
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWS | FLKR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWS
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
EWS 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWS vs FLKR Dividends
- EWS 3.91%, better
- FLKR 2.94%
- EWS $1.18
- FLKR $1.47
- EWS $0.52
- FLKR $0.30
- EWS Jun 15, 2026
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- EWS Jun 18, 2026
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- EWS Twice a year
- FLKR Twice a year
Distribution history
EWS vs FLKR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWS
- FLKR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWS 12.3%, betterFLKR 43.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWS 1.60, betterFLKR 0.97
- Worst fall
- EWS −29.0%, betterFLKR −41.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EWS 0.55FLKR 2.57
EWS and FLKR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





