FLGB ranks 3rd and EWUS 23rd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWUS vs FLGB
FLGB −0.50pt a year
0.59%0.09%
FLGB 36.0×the volume
2.92K105K
FLGB +9.6pt
+2.5%+12.1%
EWUS vs FLGB Performance
+13.0%+77.2%
- EWUS 0.59%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- EWUS $40M
- FLGB $872M
- EWUS +17.5%, better
- FLGB +16.9%
- EWUS 2.99%, better
- FLGB 2.84%
- EWUS 197
- FLGB 88
- EWUS 2.92K sh
- FLGB 105K sh, better
- EWUS $44.60
- FLGB $36.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWUS | FLGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A81Higher | A73 |
| Risk | C40 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | D25 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | A73 |
| Durability | C44 | C53Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWUS and FLGB are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWUSC
FLGBA
In short
EWUS Britain only, small caps only. While the broad funds in its category spread across the developed world, EWUS tracks a single MSCI index of roughly 200 small UK companies, and has done so since 2012.
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
Stated mandate
EWUS The fund seeks to track an index of small-capitalization equities from the United Kingdom.
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWUS vs FLGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWUS vs FLGB Cost
Overpaying EWUS vs FLGB
$9,737
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWUS 0.59%
$11,635
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWUS | FLGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $165 | $893 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $646 | $3,405 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $1,898 | $9,737 |
- 0.59%EWUS
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
EWUS 29th cheapest of 38 funds
EWUS vs FLGB Dividends
- EWUS 2.99%, better
- FLGB 2.84%
- EWUS $1.36
- FLGB $1.06
- EWUS $0.54
- FLGB $0.47
- EWUS Jun 15, 2026
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- EWUS Jun 18, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- EWUS Twice a year
- FLGB Twice a year
Distribution history
EWUS vs FLGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWUS
- FLGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWUS 17.5%FLGB 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWUS 0.84FLGB 1.44, better
- Worst fall
- EWUS −44.9%FLGB −25.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWUS 1.16FLGB 0.75
EWUS and FLGB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


