EWW ranks 1st and QAT 20th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EWW vs QAT
EWW −0.10pt a year
0.50%0.60%
EWW 54.4×the volume
1.15M21.2K
EWW +4.0pt
+7.7%+3.7%
EWW vs QAT Performance
+83.3%+4.8%
- EWW 0.50%, better
- QAT 0.60%
- EWW $1.67B
- QAT $63M
- EWW +18.3%, better
- QAT −3.4%
- EWW 3.18%
- QAT 4.74%, better
- EWW 41
- QAT 35
- EWW 1.15M sh, better
- QAT 21.2K sh
- EWW $76.78
- QAT $17.69
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWW | QAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F24 |
| Mission | B68Higher | F22 |
| Risk | B56Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | D32 |
| Durability | A81Higher | C45 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EWW and QAT are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWWA
QATD
In short
EWW Mexico in one ticker, doing that job since 1996. Roughly 40 of the country's biggest listed names, capped so no single company runs the show, for 0.50% a year.
QAT One ticker, one country. QAT tracks the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index with a tight basket of Qatari stocks, giving US investors direct access to a small Gulf market that barely registers inside a broad emerging markets fund.
Stated mandate
EWW The fund seeks to track an index composed of Mexican equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Mexico.
QAT The fund seeks to track an index composed of Qatar equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Qatar and a way to express a single-country view.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWW vs QAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWW vs QAT Cost
Overpaying QAT vs EWW
$1,838
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWW 0.50%
$9,979
QAT 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWW | QAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,076 | $176 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $4,116 | $656 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $11,817 | $1,838 |
- 0.50%EWW, cheaper
- 0.60%QAT
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWW 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
QAT 17th cheapest of 21 funds
EWW vs QAT Dividends
- EWW 3.18%
- QAT 4.74%, better
- EWW $2.46
- QAT $0.85
- EWW $1.14
- QAT $0.62
- EWW Jun 15, 2026
- QAT Jun 15, 2026
- EWW Jun 18, 2026
- QAT Jun 22, 2026
- EWW Twice a year
- QAT Twice a year
Distribution history
EWW vs QAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWW
- QAT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWW 20.1%QAT 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWW 0.56, betterQAT 0.04
- Worst fall
- EWW −31.2%, betterQAT −33.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EWW 1.06QAT 0.51
EWW and QAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
