EPOL ranks 3rd and QAT 20th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EPOL vs QAT
EPOL −0.01pt a year
0.59%0.60%
EPOL 19.9×the volume
422K21.2K
EPOL +8.7pt
+12.4%+3.7%
EPOL vs QAT Performance
+125.2%+4.8%
- EPOL 0.59%, better
- QAT 0.60%
- EPOL $1.01B
- QAT $63M
- EPOL +34.8%, better
- QAT −3.4%
- EPOL 3.36%
- QAT 4.74%, better
- EPOL 37
- QAT 35
- EPOL 422K sh, better
- QAT 21.2K sh
- EPOL $42.78
- QAT $17.69
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPOL | QAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50Higher | F24 |
| Mission | B62Higher | F22 |
| Risk | A77Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | C54Higher | D32 |
| Durability | A79Higher | C45 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EPOL and QAT are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPOLB
QATD
In short
EPOL Poland in one ticket. Running since 2010, EPOL holds roughly 30 Polish stocks under MSCI's 25/50 capping rules, and it sits in the upper tier of single-country emerging-market funds.
QAT One ticker, one country. QAT tracks the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index with a tight basket of Qatari stocks, giving US investors direct access to a small Gulf market that barely registers inside a broad emerging markets fund.
Stated mandate
EPOL The fund seeks to track an index composed of Polish equities.
QAT The fund seeks to track an index composed of Qatar equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Qatar and a way to express a single-country view.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPOL vs QAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPOL vs QAT Cost
Overpaying QAT vs EPOL
$182
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPOL 0.59%
$11,635
QAT 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPOL | QAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,076 | $18 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $4,116 | $65 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $11,817 | $182 |
- 0.59%EPOL, cheaper
- 0.60%QAT
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EPOL 7th cheapest of 21 funds
QAT 17th cheapest of 21 funds
EPOL vs QAT Dividends
- EPOL 3.36%
- QAT 4.74%, better
- EPOL $1.47
- QAT $0.85
- EPOL $0.30
- QAT $0.62
- EPOL Jun 15, 2026
- QAT Jun 15, 2026
- EPOL Jun 18, 2026
- QAT Jun 22, 2026
- EPOL Twice a year
- QAT Twice a year
Distribution history
EPOL vs QAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPOL
- QAT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPOL 17.2%QAT 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EPOL 1.64, betterQAT 0.04
- Worst fall
- EPOL −53.2%QAT −33.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EPOL 0.70QAT 0.51
EPOL and QAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

